Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Jefferson Circulation Obsolescence - Updated With Top 10!

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 27 / Views: 6,716Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
Pinenut's Avatar
United States
462 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2010  2:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Pinenut to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I love this analysis. I was thinking something similar to this could be done to approximate how much silver coinage avoided the great melt. Harder to do of course since "all" of the silver is hoarded.

It does, however, sadden me that I have but one of your top ten. I gotta get another box of nickels!
Valued Member
DylansDad's Avatar
United States
476 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2010  3:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DylansDad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well I've blown the odds out of the water! Out of my last 10 boxes...since early December. That I just plugged into a spreadsheet yesterday, I've found 3 count-em, 3 43-D's. Crazy stuff I say. I found two in back-to-back boxes on Saturday alone.

Suppose that means it'll be about 700,000 coins before I see my next one?
Pillar of the Community
cladking's Avatar
United States
2272 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2010  9:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cladking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've been thinking a lot about these numbers and trying to reconcile them with what I saw when I was doing it back around 1974- '77. At that time it seemed a lot of the pre-1950 nickels didn't circulate well. It seemed they were being hoarded a lot. Observations since then have implied this even more strongly.

One of the things the older coins had in common was that they tended to be higher grade coins which suggested that they weren't really circulating. But your data shows pretty strongly that they are. Perhaps what's happening is that people are getting smarter and dishoarding the lower grade stuff while setting aside nicer coins.

I'll keep trying to figure this out butr was hoping you could help me a little with providing a little information on grades. Two questions;

What is the approximate average grade of these categories when you toss out the outliers and are there very many outliers?
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Pillar of the Community
DNA's Avatar
United States
2734 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2010  9:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DNA to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When you take a tour of the Denver Mint, one of the machines displayed
was specifically designed to bulk-sort Silver War Nickels from regular
Nickels. Yes, it was made to pull 35% Silver Nickels from circulation
'after the war'. Those Nickels had nearly face value in Silver content,
even then!

By the way, the odds of finding older coins in circulation increased
commensurate with the "Great Coin Jar Dump of 2008-2009"...
(although this seems to have leveled off since last summer....)
Edited by DNA
01/18/2010 9:18 pm
Pillar of the Community
Gothic Florin's Avatar
United States
2541 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2010  9:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Gothic Florin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
DNA - that's interesting to hear about the " War Nickel scammer". It sounds like an evil arch-nemesis for us coin roll hunters! Do you know if they melted down the nickels they pulled?
Valued Member
mrak's Avatar
United States
99 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2010  9:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nickelsearcher, first, thanks for your post really enjoyed reading through your analysis. For the most part it looks my find rates are trending nicely to your top ten. I've copied your numbers below then compared them to my inventory through 62,720 searched nickels. As would be expected I'm a little above and below your averages but they seem to hold up. The two 38-s would appear to be the outlier but that can probably be explained by that fact that I live in the SF Bay area so they may be a little more common here.

43-D @ 188,308 - 0
44-S @ 133,385 - 0
44-D @ 89,199 - 1
42-S @ 87,572 - 1
39-D @ 85,494 - 0
45-D @ 71,449 - 0
38-S @ 72,982 - 2
50-D @ 70,406 - 0
38-D @ 55,412 - 0
45-S @ 48,915 - 1
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15473 Posts
 Posted 01/19/2010  9:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A few thoughts from me as it appears this thread has run it's natural course .....

First of all ..... I do not claim with certainty that the Top-10 stated above is in the exact proper order ...... I still have a problem with the hoarding of the 50-D that I have not solved ......

However ..... I am quite confident in the overall Top-10 listing ..... the original mintage figures are deceiving as they do not account for obsolescence ..... So I remain confident that these are indeed (by my data) the most difficult Jefferson's to find in circulation today.

Kudos to those who have found most of them ..... and I expect most dedicated nickel roll searchers could look at their findings and agree that my 'list' of Top-10 are more reflective of today's reality than original mintage figures ........

It's all due to Circulation Obsolescence.

A few replies if I may ....


Quote:
For the most part it looks my find rates are trending nicely to your top ten. I've copied your numbers below then compared them to my inventory through 62,720 searched nickels.


I should have posted that data as well mrak ..... thanks for the suggestion!

I am now at 142,800 nickels searched ..... and my humble tally versus the Top-10 is as follows ...

43-D @ 188,308 - 0
44-S @ 133,385 - 1
44-D @ 89,199 - 0
42-S @ 87,572 - 1
39-D @ 85,494 - 1
45-D @ 71,449 - 1
38-S @ 72,982 - 0
50-D @ 70,406 - 1
38-D @ 55,412 - 2
45-S @ 48,915 - 4


Quote:
I've always said Obsessive Compulsive Disorders are not a bad thing, as long as it doesn't interfere with basic life functions.


No worries eaglefoot ........ I am good so far ... but thanks for the reminder!


Quote:
I've been thinking a lot about these numbers and trying to reconcile them with what I saw when I was doing it back around 1974- '77. At that time it seemed a lot of the pre-1950 nickels didn't circulate well. It seemed they were being hoarded a lot. Observations since then have implied this even more strongly.


These coins still do not circulate well cladking ..... perhaps we are not speaking the same language ..... but I used my database tonight to address this question for you .....

What percentage of the Pre-1950 Jefferson's have been lost in cirulation in today?

The answer is 87.15% have been 'lost' ..... I can share the math if you wish ...... but that seems to me to be sufficient evidence that the pre-1950 Jefferson are scarce in relative terms to find today.


Quote:
Well I've blown the odds out of the water!


Indeed you have ...... send a few my way if you don't mind!

Puns aside ..... it's the nature of statistics to have a few outliers ...... all these 'predicted average' numbers are long term averages ..... so you Mr. DylansDad are beating the odds ..... for now.

Well .... it's time to sign off so I can go to work tomorrow .....

I hope to someday write a published article in a national magazine on this concept of Obsolescence ....... so please do not beat me to the punch with my own data.

Enjoy

David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Pillar of the Community
DNA's Avatar
United States
2734 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2010  01:52 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DNA to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Gothic Florin: Do you know if they melted down the nickels they pulled?

According to the Mint, it was built for the Federal Reserve but never
put into use. Due to the 'no pictures' rule inside the Mint, I cannot
get a picture of it, but everyone taking the tour can see it close up
and even touch it.

When someone does find a War Nickel in circulation, the odds are that
it was spent from a hoard.
Rest in Peace
numismo's Avatar
United States
3039 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2010  12:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow. Interesting study and data. Do you think that because of the economic climate now some "hoarded" coins are being turned in, increasing the possibility of a nice find ?
Valued Member
United States
436 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2010  12:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coretj to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Would you be willing to share your xls spread sheet?
Valued Member
United States
317 Posts
 Posted 02/02/2010  10:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Terror Of Zanarkand to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very impressive! And it does make me want to get out there and try to hunt some nickels! The only coins I'm missing from my circ set ( all pulled from circulation ) are the 1950-D and the 1938-S. I should get out there and hunt!
New Member
United States
44 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2010  11:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add The Silver Machine to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I may be wrong here, and I'm not trying to be a nit picker. Just wanted to clarify your math.

You used your "find" percentages. And divided them by the total mintage's of the non "find" coins, and you got the number of "finds" in circulation still. Then compared that to the mintage of your "finds" to get you obsolescence rate.

example. 1% of the coins I search are finds. 100,000 were minted that are not finds. So one could assume that 1,000 finds are circulating still.
I then know that only 10,000 finds were minted. So my obsolescence rate is 90%

I think this is what you did in your math if not sorry.


The thing is I don't think you can go by the total mintage's of non "find" coins. I think you need to go by the number of circulating non "finds". Which would be vastly lower then the total mintage's. And virtually impossible to know. But I'm sure there is a number somewhere.


new example.
1% of the coins I search are finds. 50,000 non "finds" are still circulating. So one could assume that 500 "finds" are circulating still.
I then know that only 10,000 finds were minted. So my obsolescence rate for a "find" is 95%

Hope this makes sense. And I think what your doing is awesome.

I would love to see some numbers of circulating coinage. like all the coins sitting in vaults of armored carriers. Especially of halves :)

Even if only 1,000,000,000 halves were in circulation. From my find rates of silver at .25% that means that there are 2.5 million silvers out there!

  Previous TopicReplies: 27 / Views: 6,716Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums