Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Complete Laminate Seperation Rev.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,202Next Topic  
Valued Member
joe finds's Avatar
United States
347 Posts
 Posted 01/26/2010  11:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add joe finds to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This was easy to spot. The edge is a bit taller than the surface on the rev and there are no "sanding" lines or scraping evedance to be found! And no anomalies to the very edge where copper ends and zinc begin either. The second pict is a side by side comparason with an 81 copper for a comparason of thickness. Any value or desire to this other than my own?

Complete-Laminate-Seperation-Rev.
Complete-Laminate-Seperation-Rev.
Pillar of the Community
Dave42's Avatar
United States
571 Posts
 Posted 01/27/2010  4:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dave42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm new here, but my guess is post mint damage. The copper layer is too thin to cause that much of a thickness difference. Also there should be some hint of an image if it were a lamination error. Clad coins can split where the layers are joined, but from what I understand, this won't happen with a plated zinc cent. The layer can be peeled off sometimes, especially on cents with gas bubbles under the plating, but you will still see the image underneath. Knowing what I do about machining, just because you can't see any sanding marks, doesn't mean someone didn't do it.

Have a nice day!
Dave
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2010  4:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice picture of the moon. No rims, I would guess the coin is shaved. It's zinc is showing from where I sit.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2010  5:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The plated cents are not clad coins like a quarter or a dime. A layer of copper can't split away.

There is no evidence that the coin is a split planchet error either. The coin is simply damaged. The thickness of the coin indicates that the coin was somehow shaved.

Thanks,
Bill
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,202Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums