| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,444 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
120 Posts |
Finally, I get to post a decent looking WL! Here's a 1936 ... looking for grade and thoughts ... Thanks!   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
I have a 1946 and yours looks better then mine. Good.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6385 Posts |
I agree with AU-55. There is slight rub on Liberty's left breast and on the eagle's central breast feathers and upper left thigh. Light friction has darkened the obverse fields in the open areas. This is a nice, no-problem example of this common-date Philly Walker.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:
This is a nice, no-problem example of this common-date Philly Walker.
Agreed and seconded. This is the kind of coin you keep in the collection. |
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
Slight rub. I also agree AU55. Nice original coin.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Moderator
United States
23731 Posts |
I agree a very nice AU-55.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6385 Posts |
Tcmac, I'm planning a grading presentation for an upcoming meeting of our coin club and I'm thinking about a discussion of AU verses BU for US coins. I'd like to use your images to show how wear first starts to appear on Walking Liberty halves. Is is OK with you if I use your photos? They would be perfect for my topic. Thanks! |
|
Valued Member
 United States
120 Posts |
Jaobler, absolutely ... any coin pictures I post here become common property of the forum ... your topic sounds interesting and should generate a lot discussion
Appreciate you and the rest providing me info on the coins I post ...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I'd say AU-53 because the rub is somewhat more significant IMO, but the luster is mostly there so AU-55 it is.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,444 |
|
Posted 04/10/2010 11:48 pm
