Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Mercury 1942/41

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 4,987Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
daviscfad's Avatar
United States
4541 Posts
 Posted 08/22/2010  4:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add daviscfad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:

If you say that the second image is not 42/41, you say : there are one possibility for the first to be 42/41.It's the same money mister.I am not a liar.


First off to the community

Second I never said the top picture was a 42/1 dime.

third I never said you were a liar.

Take a chill pill. you wanted to show us pictures of your MS 42/1 dime and I looked at them and said I did not think the second one was a 42/1 dime. The first picture you posted looks more like a 42/1 Denver than a 42/1 Philadelphia minted coin. and the reverse of the coin has no d mintmark

Here is a picture of a 42/1 dime Graded MS-63
Mercury-1942/41
Pillar of the Community
afclassic87's Avatar
United States
564 Posts
 Posted 08/22/2010  5:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add afclassic87 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Davis I agree with you. The first picture is a 2 over 1 but the large 2nd picture is not. I am 100% sure they are not the same coin. If you enlarge the 2nd picture it does not show the 1 or the ding marks as pictured in the first one. Maybe the wrong picture was uploaded. I'm sure this response will upset the original author. This is my opinion and by posting on a forum that's what you are looking to get.
Pillar of the Community
macmercury's Avatar
United States
5833 Posts
 Posted 08/22/2010  11:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add macmercury to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Patrick,

If you do believe that your 42/41 is authentic than you would want to submit it to PCGS or NGC for a proper grade and certification, as one in MS grade are in thousands of dollars, doing so would guaranteed it is real and for better sell down the road, but I agree with other here that the chance is nil.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2010  09:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The two pictures are of the same coin. It is hard to see but there is the same nick in the field above and right of the 9 in both pictures.

Unfortunately the grade don't matter, it is not real.

If you look at the picture of the real one that daviscfad posted you will notice that the underneath 1 is slightly past the leftmost edge of the 2 and it has a prominent upper serif. The original post coins has the left edge of the 2 noticeably left of the left edge of the 1 and there is no upper serif.
Edited by Conder101
08/23/2010 09:15 am
Pillar of the Community
Moe145's Avatar
United States
8904 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2010  11:10 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Moe145 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It appears to me that the first coin posted is a 1942 over 1 Denver mint Mercury dime. The Philadelphia mint has a much more pronounced offset 1 versus 2 than the Denver overdate of the same year, according to this guide:

http://grading-guide.com/variety_mercury.html


Of course that doesn't account for the lack of D mint mark on the reverse.

Or that I don't see much of the same overdate in the second picture...
Edited by Moe145
08/23/2010 11:21 am
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2010  11:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dcreek1968 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First picture carries some of the characteristics of the 42/41, but the date appears way to flat for me. Thus it loses some of the definition of an original 42/41. The 1 is much to flat behind the 2 which also appears way to flat. It looks like a possible counterfeit IMO. Are the chinese selling their stuff in France now too? AS for the second coin, a nice coin, but I'm going to say AU58. There appears to be wear on the uppermost horizontal band across the fasces along with some wear on the obverse above the ear. It does not appear to be overdate and definitely not the same coin as in the other picture of the date only obverse.
Rest in Peace
johnny54321's Avatar
United States
4849 Posts
 Posted 08/27/2010  6:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnny54321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin looks like a fake, or an altered date attempt to me. I may be wrong though.
Pillar of the Community
TreasHunt's Avatar
United States
2540 Posts
 Posted 09/07/2010  07:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TreasHunt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
not the overdate, for a Philly coin.

period.
  Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 4,987Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.24 seconds to rattle this change. Forums