| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,402 |
|
New Member
United States
3 Posts |
Hi all I have a ? in regards to CC morgans. Are the Gsa (the ones that come in the black holder) dollars worth less? Ive seen these sometimes at alot less than other raw/graded cc morgans? Just wondering cause the local coin dealer dont offer much in the way of "customer hospitality". Thanks Mike
|
|
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
As a rule, they tend to command a higher price than raw CC coins. The ones that you saw at higher prices than GSA ones were probably harder CC dates.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
yep the GSA Morgans cost more than a raw coin of the same date so the only reason I could think that a raw coin was higher than the GSA Morgan is if the raw coin was a rarer date/mint mark then the GSA morgan. 1882,1883,1884 are the most available dates in GSA holders so their prices are usually a freaction of the cost of other GSA Morgans
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
954 Posts |
I've been watching the GSA's on ebay lately and have noticed that the NGC graded MS63 and lower coins are going for less than most of the raw GSA's. I think everyone is hoping for a higher grade.... 
Edited by Becky 08/07/2006 7:36 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
70 Posts |
So where is the best place to find these GSA Morgans? I wouldn't mind getting my paws on a couple.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
ebay has a bunch of them. If you're smart about who you buy from, it won't be too big of a problem. Or you could go to your local dealer. They usually have a couple of them in stock.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Most of the situation regarding GSA CC Morgans have already been addressed, but I'll add my two Flying Eagle cents' worth. Becky, I keep a pretty close eye on CC Morgans on ebay since they're my specialty, but I tend to somewhat disagree about NGC-graded GSA slabbed Morgans going for less than the same raw CCs with several qualifications. First, as several pointed out, a particular year/mint/grade cannot be compared with a different year/mint/grade (e.g., a raw GSA 1882-CC in MS-63 cannot be compared with an NGC MS-63 GSA 1883-CC Morgan; 1883-CCs outnumber 1882-CCs, so the raw 82-CC will go for more). Second, your observation that some ungraded GSA's sell for more than the same GSA coin which has been graded by NGC is quite astute. Other than your speculation that buyers are hoping that they are buying a higher grade, I would add that there's a LOT of suckers out there who believe whatever the seller states in an auction. If the seller claims that the GSA is an MS-66 or MS-67, far too many believe him/her, so will bid higher than what the coin is actually worth because once it's submitted to NGC, it's gonna come back as an MS-64 or MS-63 (or lower). The smart bidder will bid up only to MS-62 or, if the bidder is feeling venturesome, maybe MS-63 and takes the chance that he/she will be outbid by a sucker. As Fengk stated, buy smart. This is especially true of GSA Morgans - with most sellers of ungraded coins, don't believe a word they say about grades. In most instances, they've inflated the grade by at least one and more likely two or more grades. Fred To others - it's my observation that GSA Morgans are getting scarcer since many collectors are cracking them out of their GSA holders and submitting them to PCGS or ANACS. As this practice continues, the numbers of GSA holdered coins decreases and their value goes up. And GSA isn't putting any more Morgans into holders. I've been watching the distance gradually widen between the value of an NGC-graded GSA Morgan and the same date/mintmark and grade in PCGS and ANACS slabs - with many exceptions. Still, there's still a LOT of raw GSA slabs out there, so it's gonna take awhile before this distance becomes universal. The moral of this story is: keep your Morgans in their original GSA holders and hope that PCGS and ANACS follows NGC's example by certifying and grading them without cracking them out of their GSA holders.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
that is the one reason I would never send a GSA to PCGS for certification. In every other instance PCGS coins sell for more than a NGC graded coin will except for the GSA coins. When I see a PCGS GSA Morgan I just think of it as a regular morgan of that date and mint mark and dont think of the history behind the GSA, but when I look at NGC GSA Morgans I automatically think about the history of the coins. I know it makes no difference the coins are still a GSA its just one is still in its original holder/box and most of the time has the COA with it and the other is just in the Third Party holder with the letters GSA stamped on the label but still I can help but be bias when looking at the two
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
I saw quite a few GSA CC- Morgans and a GSA- Peace at the coin show this weekend, has anyone else heard of this . by the way I do know that some GSA are not CC. A few of the Ones I saw were prooflike w/ a little frosting on the devices - but with lots of marks on the white that was on the cheek..
Edited by scoutjim99 08/08/2006 03:37 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
that is true, not all GSA are CC morgans. I have never seen a peace GSA and to tell you the truth never heard of one but I am in no way saying they dont exist. The GSA Dollars were found in a vault where they had been sitting for many many years and most of them were uncirculated (even some I have seen marked as circulated look uncirculated to me). Here is some information about the Carson City Mint and the GSA Dollars. The Treasury Department permitted the Carson City Mint to reopen in June 1896, limiting its activities to refining precious metal bullion. This reduction in status was formally conferred upon the facility by Congress in 1899, whereupon its coining machinery was removed and sent elsewhere. Some 22 tons of unused "CC" silver dollars (approximately 750,000 of them) were emptied from the (former) mint's vault and shipped back east. Most of them remained in storage until the 1970s, when the General Services Administration (GSA) packaged each dollar individually and offered them for sale to the public.From its opening in 1870 to the shutdown of coining operations in 1893, the Carson City Mint yielded nearly $50 million of coins in face value.The Carson City facility continued to refine gold and silver ore rather uneventfully for many years. While the old "CC" Mint toiled in relative obscurity, the United States as a nation stepped onto the world stage, rising to great heights militarily and economically, and contributed mightily in the preservation of democracy in the "War to End all Wars".In 1933, as the country was mired in the depths of the Great Depression, the facility was closed as a cost cutting measure. When the last employee turned out the lights and locked the doors, no one knew for sure the destiny awaiting the historic building.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I want to add, there is a very good write up about the GSA dollars in the "comprehensive catalog and Encyclopedia of Morgan and Peace dollars" by Leroy C. Van Allen & A. George Mallis that starts on page 397 and if you want to know alot of information about the GSA and have the book it is a very interesting read. here are the numbers the book gives and what numbers of what specific date was put in the GSA holder .............. Uncirculated.... Mixed CC.... Mixed Uncirculated.... Circulated........... Unusable1878-CC...47,567....................................................................13,426(culled) 1879-CC....3,633...............490 1880-CC..114,942.............16,587 1882-CC..122,709.............24,776 1883-CC..523,853.............222,116 1884-CC..788,630.............174,008 1885-CC..130,823.............17,462 1889-CC............................11890-CC....3,610...............339 1891-CC....5,177...............510 1892-CC............................11893-CC............................1Various P,O,S............................................27,980 Various.....................................................................................84,165.......................311 As a result of sorting operations, the GSA had five catagories of cilver dollars (1) Uncirculated CC, (2) Mixed CC (3) Mixed Uncirculated (of other mints) (4)Mixed Uncirculated and (5)Unusable (due to severe gouge or badly worn). The mixed CC category included Uncirculated CC dollars that were tarnished andscratched and were therefore to be sold at a reduced price.Also note that thismixed CC category also included one each of the Uncirculated 1889-CC, 1892-CC, and the 1893-CC. These were put in this category since there was not enough to include as seperate bid categories of the uncirculated CC. Since the Uncirculated 1878-CC were sold at the same price ($15), the culled (tarnished/scratched)1878-CC had to be sold at a lower price. All 13,426 culled 1878-CC were put in the mixed circulated category abd sold for $3 each.[:0] The rejects/errors consisted of 2 to 5 percent of the total coins of each year. The scratched/tarnished consisted of 10 to 30 percent of the total coins with 1878,1882,1883, and 1884 particularly high. The initial sorting culled out 72,000 1882-CC, 78,000 1883-CC, and 77,000 1884-CC as scratched/tarnished. Later, additional coins were added to this category for these three years. The Bank Holding Company Act Amendments which were signed by president Nixon on December 31,1970, authorizing the sale of the dollars by the GSA did not permit error or variety coins to be sold seperately from the normal coins. Thus, they were mixed in at random with the two categories of coins sold; those that met the grading standards and those that fell below the grading standards to be sold at a reduced cost.
Edited by Bryan1315 08/08/2006 1:47 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
so, would my best bet in getting a GSA morgan be an 1883-cc? (not sure if I'm reading your chart right, bryan)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
ok here is the totals of all for each year which consists of each catagory above 1878-CC=60,993 1879-CC=4,123 1880-CC=131,529 1881-CC=147,485 1882-CC=605,029 1883-CC=755,518 1884-CC=962,638 1885-CC=148,285 1889-CC=1 1890-CC=3,949 1891-CC=5,687 1892-CC=1 1893-CC=1 Various P,O,S=27,980 Various=84,476
So by that chart the 1884 is the most common with 962,638 with 1883 being the second with 755,518 and 1882 being in third most common at 605,029
Edited by Bryan1315 08/08/2006 1:55 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
Early in 1973 it was noted that some of the 1880-CC dollars in the GSA displays were of the strong overdates. At the requestof members of the numismatic hobby, the GSA further segregated the 1880-CC strong overdates into seperate boxes in the spring of 1973. These were examined by numismatists (Van Allen and Mallis) for varieties early in may 1973. Sampling of thevarious dates of Carson City dollars revealed numerous minor varieties for each date such as doubled dates and mint marks. Of special importance were the strongoverdates of the 1880-CC; VAM-4 (80/79), VAM-5 (8/7 High),and the VAM-6 (8/7 Low). From the sampling it was estimated that 15,000 VAM-4, 13,000 VAM-5 and 10,000 VAM-6 were in uncirculated category, while 1,600 VAM-4 1,900 VAM-5 and 1,000 VAM-6 were in the mixed category. Totals of the overdates sold by the GSA were about 16,000 VAM-4, 15,000 VAM-5, and 11,000 VAM-6. There were 27,980 mined non-CC Uncirculated coins. Anywhere from one to five bags existed for 1879-S, 1880-S, 1881-S, 1882-S, 1883-P, 1883-O, 1884-O, 1885-P, 1885-O, and 1887-O. The remaining were common date 1922 and 1923-P Peace dollars.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
sorry I am ranting on about this but I am just giving highlights to the ones that do not have the book to read on their own
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
that's great info, bryan. which book are you using?
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,402 |
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.48 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|