| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,568 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
VF, hard to see detail though
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
The obverse pic is not as crisp as the reverse but, LIBERTY is sharp and bold, and feather detail is decent.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
VF-35 details cleaned/corroded
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
I'll have to get some new pics. This coin is slightly darker than the pictures suggest. I don't think it's been cleaned, just corroded. Thanks for the comments! Dave
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
273 Posts |
XF details but wow does that coin have problems.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
I know. It is too bad. Scarce date. I still give it plenty of TLC ;-) The eye appeal in hand isn't too bad actually. Just those darn pits.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
I was going to say exactly what johnny54321 said
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
I'd say XF40 when buried. Still a keeper. 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Thanks DV! I guess I'll hold on to it and not spend it :o
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
689 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1213 Posts |
I can't go to XF but I'd say VF35, but badly corroded / damaged.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Thanks for the input ;-) No damage in hand, just pitted. I've graded it XF40 Details/corroded.
swcoin.ecrater.com
Edited by vermontensium 10/31/2010 10:56 pm
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,568 |
|