Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1884 Zs 8R Counterfeit?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 4,383Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community

Australia
1295 Posts
 Posted 12/22/2010  2:15 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add markn to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I picked this up on the Australian ebay recently for $20 or so and the colour is all wrong (it's a pale gold colour). Mass is about right (my high res scales are packed so this was done on some baking scales). However lettering and some other features just don't match up to the other 1884 Zs 8R I have. Assayers initials are wrong too (I think). What do you think? Here's the coin.
1884-Zs-8R-Counterfeit?
Valued Member
RealPeso's Avatar
United States
426 Posts
 Posted 12/22/2010  3:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add RealPeso to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hello markn!

Yes, unfortunately this is a modern chinese fake 8R. Usually the most common one that is seen on ebay is the 1882 with the hideous eagle design as I call it. This particular one I started seeing this year thankgoodness they are still getting it wrong so they are quite easy to spot.

Your right about the assayers initials, it is supposed to be a J.S. not a I.S.

A couple other features they got wrong is the superscript s next to the Z is not supposed to have that line through it, the overexagerated eagle & snakes head, the hollow looking eagle head, the thick rays, the gaps in the cap and the plumage on the eagle is wrong.

When I started collecing 8R's I unfortunately purchased a couple fakes but at least you have a example of a fake to add to your collection.

Nice quality picture by the way!
Edited by RealPeso
12/22/2010 3:10 pm
Pillar of the Community
tumbleweedtrumpet's Avatar
United States
1418 Posts
 Posted 12/22/2010  6:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tumbleweedtrumpet to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just remember this with these coins: if it looks like it was minted yesterday, it probably was!
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1295 Posts
 Posted 12/22/2010  7:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add markn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This one doesn't look like it was minted yesterday. Odd looking beast but not unattractive. It was cheap so I'll be hanging onto it.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2010  10:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
marknWelcome to the world of "UN-real Reales"

I have been collecting the counterfeit versions of the Cap and Ray 8R for over 50 years and find them fascinating.

The one you have is an "Evolved" design of Chinese origin. There are numerous 1884 Zs forgeries which have changed over time. I believe they are all from China (not 100% certain) and the features (the errors) were made one at a time. This progression of accumulative errors is why I believe they represent a series of copies. The errors are passed on. The original forgery in the series is well executed but the eagle was re-engraved to strengthen the impression. I believe this was a transfer impression. This re-cutting exaggerated some of the features like the head and feathers. The next in the series blunders caused the Straight J in the assayer initials to become an I. The long serifs top and bottom came later. At this point the edge is always reeds applied with a ring die. Then the production method changed to a collared three die press and the edge became reeded but with no split tails. The upset rim and odd dentils came along with the collared press. The final error was the $ superscript on the Zs. With each new version of the 1884 Zs the dies get cruder. So now we have this very odd Eagle. At one point as a study I put together pictures of the 6 coin evolution. But that was on my old PC and those pictures are gone.

By the way, this version is sometimes marked "COPY" but the location is usually on one of the Oak Leaves on the left side of the coin - hard to spot. I have seen more than one with the identical location of the stamp so it is likely they were at one time added by the manufacturer which in turn means that the coin was likely in production AFTER 1984. There may be a newer example of this coin that I have only seen in pictures. All of the superscripts have transformed into dollar signs.

Some of these look absolutely brand new with no attempt at artificial aging so in some form they may still be in production.

The 1882 Zs is more common Chinese forgery (about 30 to 1 based on ebay appearances over the past 3 years) but like this one NEITHER contains any silver at all.

They are Tourist Class Modern Numismatic Forgeries under my system of classification.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 4,383Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums