| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,575 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
she's simply gorgeous... 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
It looks to be around XF+ at least, but the reverse looks to have had an old wipe.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
225 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
870 Posts |
I'm gonna say AU-50 (++) Really beautiful coin, Moe! =)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
xf45+++. SLQ's are one of my favorites, beautiful coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5832 Posts |
I agree with delaner that is at least AU-50, but is that a rim damage I see on the reverse. Nice attractive coin never-less.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
Quote: Really beautiful coin, Moe! =) I'm humbled! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
266 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Way to go Moe! AU-50 imho.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
That's a heck of a die crack. Perhaps that die crack could be used to find dateless 1917 T2s
|
|
Valued Member
United States
307 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6385 Posts |
I'd call it AU-53, with slight visible wear on the high points. Not enough head detail for FH status. Luster looks about average for an AU SLQ. The mark at 8:30 on the reverse looks like a rim bruise that fortunately only affects the reverse. A very attractive coin overall. The 1917 Type 2 coins seem scarce compared to the Type 1's; at least, you don't see them as often.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,575 |
|