The identity seems fine, though your pics are upside down. These billon coins are usually called "jitals" rather than "dirhams". The script on this coin is an early form of Arabic. See this zeno.ru page for a bunch of similar coins.
With ancient and mediaeval coins, it can sometimes be hard to tell the difference between wear, corrosion and weakness or defective strike. I personally tend to lump it all in together when I grade an ancient or mediaeval coin, since the effect is similar and the net results as far as effect on desirability and price is similar.
VG would be a fair call for this coin, I think. Perhaps down to G; it depends on whether the strange pitting effect visible in the pics is actually on the coin or rather, as I suspect, an artefact of the scanner.
With ancient and mediaeval coins, it can sometimes be hard to tell the difference between wear, corrosion and weakness or defective strike. I personally tend to lump it all in together when I grade an ancient or mediaeval coin, since the effect is similar and the net results as far as effect on desirability and price is similar.
VG would be a fair call for this coin, I think. Perhaps down to G; it depends on whether the strange pitting effect visible in the pics is actually on the coin or rather, as I suspect, an artefact of the scanner.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis






















