| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,576 |
|
New Member
United States
37 Posts |
OK, here are the rules, 1. You can only make 1 trip for one day back in time to the date and location of your choosing. 2. You could only purchase 100 coins and could not cherry pick (for example, you couldn't go to the Philadelphia mint in 1955 and say you only wanted to buy double dies, you would have to buy 2 rolls and take your chances). 3. You could buy any combination of denominations you wanted to, but only coins, no currency. ----------------------- Personally, I'd go to the San Francisco mint in 1893 and buy 100 Morgans..... 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
Denver - 1927 - if money doesn't count into the equation and you get to choose 100 coins then it would be the 1927D Double Eagles. I would get 100 of them and come back to now and never have to make another man rich off of my blood, sweat and tears.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
773 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Irishraider
Denver - 1927 - if money doesn't count into the equation and you get to choose 100 coins then it would be the 1927D Double Eagles. I would get 100 of them and come back to now and never have to make another man rich off of my blood, sweat and tears.
 :) sn31
|
|
Valued Member
United States
85 Posts |
1885 and get me some Nickels
|
|
Valued Member
United States
218 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by sn31
quote: Originally posted by Irishraider
Denver - 1927 - if money doesn't count into the equation and you get to choose 100 coins then it would be the 1927D Double Eagles. I would get 100 of them and come back to now and never have to make another man rich off of my blood, sweat and tears.
:) sn31
The problem is that 100 of those on the market would change their value significantly. It wouldn't be a million dollar coin anymore, maybe just a 100 thousand dollar coin. And isn't the problem that they were never circulated and then they were melted down en masse? That means your odds of getting one in a roll would be pretty slim. Not that it is a bad choice. I think I would go to Philadelphia in 1796and get 20 each of quarter dollars, half dollars, eagles, half eagles, and quarter eagles. hmmm, that would be nice!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
335 Posts |
I guess,first thought would be around 1845,to Dolonaga,Ga.and as long as I had a bunch of twentys,would buy 2 rolls of double eagles.( If they made em?)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts |
id go to the year 3000, anywhere. considering i'd be the first person to ever have a coin 1000 years yet to be made, I'm sure it'd be worth a lot...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
157 Posts |
Sometimes I dream about what it would have been like to tour our first Mint in Philadelphia in its very early years. It's hard to believe today, but "Ye Olde Mint", as they called it back then, actually used horses to power some of their machinery.
In answer to your question, volfan, I'll pick the Philly Mint in 1794. While I'm there, I'll take 100 silver dollars, please.
Some of the Mint buildings mentioned earlier in this thread are still standing. Alas, "Ye Olde Mint" is long gone. The last of it was demolished around 1910.
Thanks for the topic, volfan!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
439 Posts |
Hmmmm, interesting question Volfan. Aside from going after the high dollar, ultra rare coins and just grabbing something I'd love to have in great shape I think I'd go to the San Fransisco mint near the tail end of 1909 and see if I could score some IHCs as well as some S VDBs and regular S mint cents. Id get a few of whatever denominations I could pick up as well but I'd love to have those Three Cents looking all red and new and I'll never be able to shell out the cash for them in that shape. If I could bend the rules a bit and get some of my 100 coins from circulation I'd grab whatever I could from as far back as I could as well. Imagine walking around to the stores and seeing all these old coins looking bright and shiny or even A.U. and getting them for face value. Forget about viagra, I'm getting excited just thinking about this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by The_Cave_Troll
quote: Originally posted by sn31
quote: Originally posted by Irishraider
Denver - 1927 - if money doesn't count into the equation and you get to choose 100 coins then it would be the 1927D Double Eagles. I would get 100 of them and come back to now and never have to make another man rich off of my blood, sweat and tears.
:) sn31
The problem is that 100 of those on the market would change their value significantly. It wouldn't be a million dollar coin anymore, maybe just a 100 thousand dollar coin. And isn't the problem that they were never circulated and then they were melted down en masse? That means your odds of getting one in a roll would be pretty slim. Not that it is a bad choice.
I think I would go to Philadelphia in 1796and get 20 each of quarter dollars, half dollars, eagles, half eagles, and quarter eagles. hmmm, that would be nice!
Wouldn't put them all on the market at once. I am not a greedy man. 1 a year would be enough for me not to have to work for the rest of my life. I don't know if they put these in rolls back then either. I don't know everything, I was merely dreaming. Thanks for taking my dream away, now I will have to slave away for the rest of my life. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
There is a problem with the entire idea. First, unless robbery was the intent, you would have to come up with money of THAT time to use to purchase the coins. Secondly, anything brought back would change the present enough to possibly even make your birth never happen. Third, the records of what happened to certain coins would be changed and some rare coins would not be rare anymore. Fourth, such a modification in the time line could possibly make the usage of coins no longer required.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by just carl
There is a problem with the entire idea. First, unless robbery was the intent, you would have to come up with money of THAT time to use to purchase the coins. Secondly, anything brought back would change the present enough to possibly even make your birth never happen. Third, the records of what happened to certain coins would be changed and some rare coins would not be rare anymore. Fourth, such a modification in the time line could possibly make the usage of coins no longer required.
Ah, someone else who recognizes the conundrum and paradox of time travel. Must be a Trekkie like myself  . First, Carl, welcome to the forum! Looks like you're gonna fit in very nicely here. As you've already observed, the CC family is very friendly and its collective knowledge is awesome. Other than the violation of a number of laws of physics (and probably theology, probability, mathematics and a few other fields) making time travel into the past impossible (Star Trek series notwithstanding), yet putting all this aside to presume it can be done, the ramifications and laws of unintended consequences must be considered. A perturbation in the time line of even the smallest dimension could create a massive disturbance of the time line. For example, if one were to go back in time to, say, the Carson City mint in 1889 to pick up 100 Morgan silver dollars fresh off the presses. (Presume there are no Time Police.) Just before going up the steps, one were to step on a migrating ant, a seemingly insignificant act. Well, this ant was to have been the progenitor (Founder Effect) of its whole species which was to dominate the Nevada and surrounding parts of the southwest, but by removing it from the population, the species does not become dominant. Another, more aggressive, reproductively successful, and worse a poisonous ant species migrates in, becomes an infestation and quickly takes over Nevada, then Utah, Arizona, southern central and southern California and other regions adjacent. When the traveler goes back to his/her own period, s/he finds the entire southwest is uninhabited except for ants. The issue of the value of the 89CC Morgans becomes irrelevant since the perpetrator time traveler is captured as soon as s/he returns to his/her originating time line and is immediately hanged (there are no trials in the new time line).  The moral of the story is: "Don't mess with Mother Time.".  Fred-the-Vulcan PS - The thought behind this story is from an original Twightlight Zone or Outer Limits episode in which a guy travels back, kicks a rock, and changes wives. He kept changing wives looking for a perfect one until, at the end, he got one... well, she was more than he hoped for. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
867 Posts |
Fred- that must have been me you saw at the Carson City mint loading up my pockets with Morgan dollars...  You can call off the time-cops now! Rachel 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
United States Assay office of Gold (once Moffat & Company) for me !!! I can just feel that pocket full of 10 and 20 dollar Gold Pieces hot off the presses !!! the year 1852 !!!
Not only would the investment have been worth while, this time in US History is truely intriguing,, to think that private mints could operate producing legal tender coins which were readily accepted by the masses !!
Rick
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
227 Posts |
For me it would have to be San Francisco, 1915 and buy the Panama pacific expo set and only 1 of each (I'm not greedy I just like them!!)of the individual coins 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1152 Posts |
id go to one of two places- Phidelphia 1792-93, or Denver 1964. I think this is self explanitory!
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,576 |