| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,620 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
460 Posts |
1st off, I am terrible at grading some types of coins and this series just happens to be one of them. I think I got a pretty good deal on this one, just trying to figue the grade. What do you think?   |
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
162 Posts |
It seems choice AU-55. Nice Indian!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
 Nice! swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Concur with the crowd on AU-55 nice IHC! |
|
Valued Member
 United States
460 Posts |
WOW, I was way off. Figured it was VF30ish. Here are some close up pics... Machine Doubling?   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
I agree with AU-55. Nice doubling
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Luster seems weak for the level of wear. I agree with an AU-53 to 55 grade for detail but that would require that significant amounts of luster remain. If the surfaces really look as dull as shown in the images I'd value it in the EF-45 to AU-50 range.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
201 Posts |
Yeah, lack of luster would knock this down to an XF45 for me... maybe an AU50 on a good day.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
266 Posts |
AU-55 details but yeah, the luster is all gone. Was it a ground find maybe? Looks lightly corroded all over almost.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
There is a reverse doubled die, Snow 10 for this year. However, I do not know the diagnostics of this variety.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
460 Posts |
ANACS graded it at 53. Better then I thought. Will get pics up when I get it in hand.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Machine Doubling was more frequent on the CuNi FEs and IHCs The 1863 DDR looks different; I'd say MD. with AU55 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,620 |
|
Posted 03/22/2011 8:51 pm
