| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,484 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
New arrival, please grade and comment. Thank You.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
721 Posts |
Very nice! MS 65-66? Total guess on my part...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
63 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Nice coin! I'm calling this one AU58. Looks like slight rub on reverse leaves.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10982 Posts |
Thanks for the guesses guys. Before I show the slab a hint: It graded MS.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I'm thinking 62. The fields are very clean and has the look of a higher grade, but I'm guessing some cabinet friction on the devices knocked it down a bit. It certainly is a beauty!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I will say MS-65
Edited by fenton 04/20/2011 10:52 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
63-64 but I would personally call it 64 due to the high eye appeal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
763 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
689 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
Grade=  Nice Coin 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
312 Posts |
Stunning coin! I'm going with 64 as well
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
642 Posts |
I'm jumping on the 64 badwagon. Beautiful coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10982 Posts |
Thanks for all the grades and comments! 64 was my first thought when seeing it too. There is a little chatter at the base of the neck and a couple little hits on the chin and in the field in front of the chin that could knock it down to 63 though. Here she is - back in the 1986-1987 timeframe PCGS said MS62. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
312 Posts |
Hope you paid MS-62 prices as well on it - quite a find! Think its worth cracking it out and giving modern grading standards a shot?
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,484 |
|