| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,886 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
642 Posts |
I like both Classic and Modern US coins, much more partial to Classic though. Kinda a rivalry going in my mind, US classic coins have just barely more topics than Moderns on the forum. Moderns have much more replies...  Kinda a popularity contest of sorts  Not really of any consequence.... but nothing wrong with a rivalry in good fun.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
870 Posts |
Yeah, I prefer classics I guess because they have more "character" - they've witnessed more history. But I'm not one of these guys that says the modern stuff is terrible. Of course, the metal is garbage, but the strikes and the designs are pretty cool. And some of the "classic" designs simply aren't nice either. Either way, it's hard to appreciate something you're flooded with compared to a more unique item you don't see every day. =)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I collect all types of coins so classic or modern makes no difference to me. And sometimes I'm not sure which is which with some. So many overlaps in dates makes it rather tuff to say one way or the other so I just collect them all. Mercury dimes ended in 1945 but Indian Head NIckels ended in 38. Lincoln Cents started way before all of those so shouldn't that be classic? Yet they continue today where as few of the ones around when those started are more than a memmory. Washington quarters started in 32 and a few years later many other coin types stopped. Rather than worrying about which is what, I just collect them all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
642 Posts |
For me classic is when they still held to the precedent set by George Washington. Our coins should glorify ideals, not men. Coins still depicting LIBERTY, are the classics. For Dollars that ends in 1935, Halves 1947, Quarters 1930, Dimes 1945, Nickels 1938 (Indian Head symbolized Westward expansion) Cents 1909.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
I prefer classic coins. When you hold a well circulated 200 year old coin in you hand, you can't help but wonder who may have handled this coin. Maybe someone famous? Was the coin present during important historical events ? These are questions that can never be answered be they do add to the "mystique' of a classic Coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
Although I prefer classics, I recognise it's mainly because I'm also a classic: I grew up with Mercuries, Walkers, etc.., in my change, and I could go to the bank and ask for silver dollars. If I was
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
oops, hit the button too soon, I think you get the idea - if I was 16 years old, and just starting, I'm guessing I'd be collecting what I see in circulation today!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
737 Posts |
I'm beginning to dabble into classic coins and I love it. There's so much history behind them. It's fun to think about where that coin has been.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I think just about every coin collector likes classic coins but that doesn't mean they collect them. The moderns can be had at face value and are easy to acquire even for someone on a budget. With classics if you do not roll search and get lucky enough to find them every now and then the only way to acquire them is to purchase them, trade for them or someone give them to you. I am willing to bet there is no one that would turn down a classic coin no matter what condition and would even pay for shipping to them, try to give away a regular worn down modern coin and unless its a key date no one would ever speak up to take it
|
|
Valued Member
United States
337 Posts |
I of course being only 21 and collecting for 2 years started with the moderns It doesn't mean I like them any more then the classics, its just they are easier for me to get my hands on. cheaper too! This is the reason I would like to one day put together a dansco type set album you get to see all the US coinage in one place displayed beautifully showing all out country's coin history page after page They are all great to me and one day I will own one of each!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts |
I really love the look and history to the classic coins. Although I don't have a whole bunch of them in my collection, mainly because of the expense to collect most of these. But if I really find a beauty I don't feel bad about dropping the money on a good one. I guess you could say most of the coins I collect are right on the cusp of being classic/modern. Such as Silver Washington quarter in Unc. condition that are still affordable, Jefferson nickels, late year Indians etc. But I love them all, such a great hobby!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
931 Posts |
Although I collect Indian gold coins and Buffalo nickels, I have a true love of 90% Washington quarters. I have some from the 30's to the 60's that have such a deep strike and gorgeous toning they remind me of a Michelangelo sculpture. The new quarters, although they still are Washingtons, have a strike is so shallow that they remind me of fake coins or tokens. However I have collected every State Quarter that I've ever received in change for reasons unknown, but I have a considerable amount of them stuck away. To me the line between classic and modern coins is often blurred.
Edited by junior e 05/01/2011 1:02 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1817 Posts |
Classic coins, particularly 90% silver, when the feel of money actually was worth something in the hand. There is something wonderful about holding a handful of bright shiny silver coins, and the sound they made jangling in a coat pocket. Not like today's barely recognizable tokens that pass for coins. I received three Abraham Lincoln dollars out of the Coke machine yesterday, while novel, it was not the same.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts |
Quote: The new quarters, although they still are Washingtons, have a strike is so shallow that they remind me of fake coins or tokens. This is so true. The coins of today seem to have a very shallow strike, they do appear kind of like a plastic token or something. The classic designs to the coins of old are just so much easier to appreciate in my eyes. I'm sure most would agree with this.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,886 |
|