| Author |
 Replies: 9 / Views: 6,151 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
721 Posts |
For background information, I posted a similar thread on Lincoln Cents: https://goccf.com/t/88992#735292Now for the Morgan dollars. I only included business strikes (no proofs), and also compare my findings with the current price (as found on numismedia.com for G4.) From the LWC study: key date z-values were found to be -2.2 and less; semi-keys between -2.2 and -1.5. To get a z-value, I determine the relative standard deviation from the mean (log mintage) values. The results for the "top 10" Morgan dollars are as follows: 1893-S -2.69 key 1894 -2.62 key 1885-CC -2.08 semi-key 1881-CC -1.88 semi-key 1893-O -1.87 semi-key 1899 -1.80 semi-key 1889-CC -1.76 semi-key 1893 -1.70 semi-key 1895-S -1.66 semi-key 1895-O -1.57 semi-key I've based my key and semi-key distinctions based on the LWC series. I then compared the price (G4 based on numismedia.com) with these z-values. The graph below shows the log (price) on the y-axis and z-value on the x-axis.  These results are similar to other series I've studied this way (LWC, IHC, Mercury dimes, and Walkers). One comment is the 1903-O which seems over-priced for its relative mintage. I don't know much about Morgan dollars, so someone might have some more info on this. Comments? Thanks for reading... |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
1903-O is a statistical anomaly - few were released for circulation, but many remained in vaults and were dumped on the market in Mint State in the 60's. Easy to find in MS, rather rare circulated. Given that so many Morgans were melted, mintage figures don't always correlate with demand/rarity.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1285 Posts |
SD, would VAM premium's if any affect rarity and then subsequently pricing? (Meaning skew the data). Also, does it make sense to pick G4 as a starting point.I am not sure on this one. Thanks |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
721 Posts |
Thanks for the comments guys. I also did the same analysis using MS-63 prices, and the graph is shown below:  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I am having a hard time reading that graph to make heads or tails of it. It may be because I am having to use my phone or laptop to connect online right now but those dots don't really speak information to me
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
 The graphs would be more interesting if I could associate each dot with a mintage. Great work!  Edited by DVCollector
05/23/2011 6:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
721 Posts |
Thanks guys. I can generate the same plot but by using the logarithm of the mintage values on the x-axis and the same logarithm of the price on the y-axis:  The reason that I am using the z-value on the x-axis on my plots is so that I can compare directly between different coin sets (walkers, IHC, etc.) of different mintages. This is something that I am currently working on. The z-value gives a measure of the relative mintage within a set. The concept of a log-log plot is simple. It gives a sort of macroscopic view of the graph when large numbers are involved. Compare that with the following simple graph which, in my opinion, does not give much useful visual information:  Now getting to the other question you raised. When I use the MS-63 prices you see more "floaters" (for lack of a technical term), where a larger proportion of higher mintage coins have been elevated in price. I believe that the G-4 price scale gives a better reflection on price/mintage trends, as opposed to which ones are harder to find in UNC condition. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1285 Posts |
Quote:
mintage figures don't always correlate with demand/rarity More about SD's comment below and my 2 cents. Not sure if you have seen this or not about the melting. Keep in mind the melt was NOT uniform / NOT same percentage of coins for any given year. http://www.pcgs.com/articles/articl...iverseid=313Theoretically it is possible / probable that large mintage coins in reality could be rather rare. Some Collectors (not to offend anyone here) gravitate towards known rare coins and bid up prices when in fact something else could be rarer. Other collectors go after certain coins thus driving up "interest" in a particular coin which has large mintage but few available in the market for resale thus affecting price. Distinct variables (wild cards) affecting price. I always find Slicing and dicing data fascinating and will follow your work on Morgan's to see how it proceeds. Best wishes. Edited by Ceylon62
05/24/2011 08:10 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
721 Posts |
Ceylon62 - interesting article. I did know about the melting, but it was nice to read about it again. I will agree with the comment you quoted that mintage figures do not always correlate with demand/rarity, but I'm rather surprised on how well it actually does correlate on a general scale; some type sets better than others.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
Quote:
1903-O is a statistical anomaly - few were released for circulation, but many remained in vaults and were dumped on the market in Mint State in the 60's. Easy to find in MS, rather rare circulated. Given that so many Morgans were melted, mintage figures don't always correlate with demand/rarity. I'm reminded of the scientist who wanted to determine the effect on a 4-legged flee of cutting its legs off. He devises an experiment whereby he first conditions the flee to jump upon verbal command. Then, he begins the experiment. He cuts off the 1st leg and yells "Jump!" and the flee jumps. So, he records in his notebook, cutting off the 1st leg has no effect. He cuts off the 2nd leg and yells "Jump!" and the flee jumps. So, he records in his notebook, cutting off the 2nd leg has no effect. He cuts off the 3rd leg and yells "Jump!" and the flee jumps. So, he records in his notebook, cutting off the 3rd leg has no effect. He cuts off the 4th leg and yells "Jump!" and the flee doesn't jump. He yells "Jump!" and the flee doesn't jump. He yells "Jump!!" and the flee doesn't jump. So, he records in his notebook, cutting off the 4th leg causes the flee to go deaf.  |
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 6,151 |
|
Posted 05/21/2011 7:05 pm
