Gonzalo de Sandoval Hello - in my opinion the coin is a forgery. There are several reasons.
1. The coin has many small pores in the surface that survived the polishing of the mold.
2. The dentils especially at the ET IND are very poorly formed. They appear to be engraved.
3. The field of the coin do not match the texture of the raised portions of the coin in areas where the punch should have smoothed the surfaces.
4. Soft die breaks in the rosettes and the Pomegranate
5. The rough texture on the sides of the letters and sharply defined features.
6. Lack of sharp transitions.
7. The edge design is too variable to be real.
Overall this cast impression is very similar to a 1750 that I recently received in the mail for appraisal. In that case the weight was similar to this one (26.89 grams) but the SG was 9.79 - far too low to be an original - about 600 fine. I suspect an SG test would produce similar results in this case.
1. The coin has many small pores in the surface that survived the polishing of the mold.
2. The dentils especially at the ET IND are very poorly formed. They appear to be engraved.
3. The field of the coin do not match the texture of the raised portions of the coin in areas where the punch should have smoothed the surfaces.
4. Soft die breaks in the rosettes and the Pomegranate
5. The rough texture on the sides of the letters and sharply defined features.
6. Lack of sharp transitions.
7. The edge design is too variable to be real.
Overall this cast impression is very similar to a 1750 that I recently received in the mail for appraisal. In that case the weight was similar to this one (26.89 grams) but the SG was 9.79 - far too low to be an original - about 600 fine. I suspect an SG test would produce similar results in this case.






















