| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,114 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
675 Posts |
I have read here and in other places about the coin market essentially crashing in the 1980s. I started collecting in about 1987 to 1988 when I was 10, so I don't really remember this. Just curious as to any reasons why the market "crashed".
Thanks,
Thundercoin
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
455 Posts |
I guess there were more sellers than buyers. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
675 Posts |
Yes, that would be economics 101. I was figuring there might be a little more to it than that..... maybe there is a non-wiseguy out here who can give more insight.
Thundercoin
|
|
Valued Member
United States
455 Posts |
Sorry Thundercoin. Just an attempt at a little light humor. If it wasn't received that way, I apologize.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
675 Posts |
No your post was fine, but hard to tell whether or not a joke online as it often can be... Just one of those days at work today, so I'm a bit moody!  Thundercoin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
Here's the extent of my knowledge as to what went on: A lot of investors drove up the price on the rare coin market which also drove up the prices on generics. And at that same time, there was an attempt to corner to silver market by some family (I forget the name), which drove silver up to $50 an ounce. So you combine those two factors, and you have this super hot coin market, where generic MS64 morgans were selling upwards of $200, and other coins were even crazier. Eventually, the market started cooling off, and frantic investors decided to sell their large holdings of rare coins, flooding the market and crashing it.
Again, I could be totally wrong, and this is just my garbled view of things.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
100 Posts |
Was not collect coins at that time.Had collect a few year before.and could have sold any silver coins for 22 times its face value.Think Hunt was driving silver prices up.When Hunt stop buying up all the silver.Prices fell,and so did the silver coins. BIRD OUT
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
yep, hunt brothers ran out of money, nobody left to buy the silver so the prices fell very quickly, people committed suicide because they had lost their life savings
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
For the same reason that everything grows and declines: "Strength becomes weakness, weakness becomes strength." Sun Tzu
The primary trend will become the counter-trend, The counter-trend will become the primary trend.
I'm not aware of any past bull markets in anything,--stocks, coins, gold, tulips, swamp land in Florida, that didn't decline or crash or both sooner or later. Most up markets become "bull markets" because that exactly what they become--"bull." DELUSIONAL. When the talk begins about: "well of course no one really knows where the top is" That's the time, IMO, to start worrying. It's true that no one knows where the top is in markets but it's only a half truth. The top is still there somewhere. And each spike in prices brings you closer to the top wherever it is--more risk. Each spike in prices reduces the distance left to the top wherever it is--less reward. The longer it goes on the more inverted the risk/reward ratio becomes which clearly can't go on forever. Not even in a society of investing imbeciles such as what we have on wallstreet today.
Eventually, the cheer leaders must take the stage and start spinning a yarn about "New Paradigms," and "Uncharted waters." Trying to transform fear into a spirit of adventure on the frontier. IMO, that's the time to run for door. Because playing musical chairs in a crowded room is neither an investment nor a frontier. Really, a frontier by definition is not crowded.
IMO the decline or crash if you prefer, in the early 80's in coins was for the same as it was for past declines. Gradflation was off the charts. If, in 1979, no one had stabbed a Walker in the face with an ice pick it was MS70.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
In 1978, the Salomon Brothers first published their Survey of Tangible Assets. For those of you who don't remember, Salomon Brothers were among the most respected of Wall Street investment firms, a firm of such reputation and size as to be able to move the market themselves by their endorsements and actions. The Survey of Tangible Assets was a comparison study of the investment value of tangibles like rare coins, stamps, art, land, foreign exchange, and the like, compared to "traditional" investment vehicles like stocks and bonds. The conclusion of that first 1978 survey was that, over the last 10 years, rare coins had outperformed all of the traditional areas of investment, and appeared ready to continue to do so in the future. Coming from the Salomon Brothers, that was practically a command to invest in rare coins. As you might imagine, rare coin prices shot upward. For the rest of this mini-article, reference the PCGS 3000 Index for the last 30 years, here: http://www.pcgs.com/coinindex/indexallgraph.chtmlNote the initial spike immediately after the Survey was first issued, followed by a small correction when the wannabees realized that they weren't comfortable in the environment. Now, remember, back then rare coins weren't even on the radar as an investment vehicle. Very few people collected for that purpose, unlike today. Anyways, the Salomon Brothers published their survey every year after 1978. Stack's was chosen to handle the rare coin end of things, choosing a list of coins to be represented in the market basket and compiling data. Throughout the 80's, prices rose dramatically every year, as more and more investors competed with more and more ferocity for the same amount of coins. Note the huge upturn around May 1988, the result of the huge stock market crash of October 19, 1987 - the largest single-day drop on history. Other forces were at play, also. The market acceptance of third-party grading and the subsequent scarcity of slabbed coins (in the beginning), the build-up to the First Gulf War, and, most of all, the entrance of the large Wall Street firms into the market on behalf of their customers, cause the amazing spike in 1989. Wall Street's involvement didn't last long (there weren't enough coins to satisfy their cravings), the Gulf War didn't last long, and the FTC pressured Salomon Brothers to remove coins from their reporting due to unscrupulous telemarketers/investors hyping coins and abusing the market. The bottom fell out of the market. Now, if you take all that into account with the PCGS 3000, and eliminate everything directly attributable to all this hype (and it was all hype and speculation), you'll note that rare coins have basically been an extremely solid long-term investment. They always have been, and they always will. There will never be any more of them than there are today, which is the very definition of rarity, and in true rarity there is true value.
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3147 Posts |
The Hunt brothers FAILED attempt to corner the silver market may have well worked had their INVESTORS not attempted to cash in for the profits that were eventually being paid with silver at $50 an ounce. The very money the Hunt brothers were using to control the market eventually was what destroyed their efforts and plans. Everything related to precious metals had to follow suit, in one way or another, so the coin market took its tumble. This is the PRIMARY reason why one should avoid slabbed, hyped coins from the grading companies. The prices are artificially established with no merits or basis. Also one must consider when they hype "one of the five best known" what they are really saying is one of the five best graded and slabbed by the grading companies. Some of the companies will also be referring to their OWN records and not the records of all grading companies. Basically put, what they are really saying is 5 high grade coins are all that is on record but that doesn't mean there are not many more of the same coin, in the same grade or better condition, in collections world wide. It simply means all the others have not been graded and slabbed. There are a great number of coins, especially moderns, that are extremely high grade that will never be submitted for grading and slabbing and they DO exsist so why pay hyped inflated, imaginary prices when you can safely and economically have the same coin, in raw condition, for much less money. I am at a loss why anyone would pay a $100 bucks for a slabbed silver eagle when the same coin is available for a percentage over spot prices? The grading companies have created a false market that will eventually fail just as the Hunt brothers did in the early 80's! Bottom line is keeping in mind that someday you may WISH to sell every coin you own and to do so you MUST have a buyer. Buy wisely!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Lets not forget that the coin market is directly tied to income,, in the early eighties the US economy went into depression, many people lost everything ,job ,house, savings everything (I barely survived by doing bathrooms and a few kitchens every month) I was a self employed floorcovering contractor at the time. and with that type of economy one of the first things to go are hobbies, no money to buy coins or anything else outside of the necessities.
Rick
Edited by Metalman 11/27/2006 7:54 pm
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3147 Posts |
Metalman that is a very good point and for what it is worth I am there right now! While I got downsized I can assure you NO ONE higher up lost one red cent! It has been a struggle and you are correct as the first thing that had to change was my coin buying habits. Quite frankly, in the last year a tremendous amount of my collection has been sold and I am so thankful I had it for such an emergency. I am now collecting but sticking to my Buffalo nickels and other odds and ends that attract me. Of course my European friends and Aussie friends are still providing me with those coins I desire but even that had to slow down. I do see a light at the end of the tunnel but it isn't very bright or big at this time!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
Here's another link that might be interesting. http://www.numismedia.com/law/01-08-23.shtmlAlso interesting is the John J. Ford auctions which I believe so far have realized 50 million, with more auctions to follow. Ford didn't buy into hype or fads or even federal issues it would appear. The shysters can't hype such things as Indian Peace medals. Hype is used on the *crowds.* What is being hyped has to exist in large quantities. Which makes the whole thing a contradiction. How can something be "rare" if it's limited to 10,000 per house hold? 
Edited by longnine009 11/28/2006 09:22 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
All true comments and Metalman also was correct. Housing went into a slump as interest rates were high 12%+, and then the stock market fell 500 points in one day (around '86 I believe) which was a lot then (pre internet trades) and private investors lost their shorts in petroleum. The Hunt brothers drove the market up (early 80's). Silver was around $50/oz and gold was about where it is now $600/oz or so. Does this all sound familiar? These are just some of the factors involved in the metals markets/coin markets, etc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
675 Posts |
Great information all... thanks for sharing, I found the replies to be very interesting! I had no idea about the Hunt's driving up the price of silver. That is one interesting story! Thundercoin 
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,114 |
|