quote:
Originally posted by SuperDave
I should think not, from a photo alone. I would imagine records exist of die markers for every proof ever minted, though. Just about every coin minted has had its' own obsessive specialist at some point down through the years.
I agree, but with so many of these coins available on ebay as proofs and I am looking to build a US long type set in proof only (as far as I can go) I have never opted to purchase one from the auctions that stated proof without verified documentation.
The only pre 1879 proofs on ebay or any other auction site that I will ever purchase are those in NGC / PCGS slabs, but this is not what I really want to accomplish. My dream type set is a Dansco US Type Set album filled with proofs (circulated proofs are ok) and then along with that I would have a victorian leather file filled with the documentation. Hopefully some of those papers will be very old as I collect ephemera also.
Slabs just don't do it for me! Actually I have been reduced to creating my own documentation (post 1879) by utilizing hi-res photography of the coin in the slab and then creating a paper trail on the coin in .pdf format and having the selling dealer sign the documentation and having the documentation notarized. This is quite the hassle.
I am rather annoyed at dealers on ebay saying a coin is a proof and not referencing the documentation that would back up their claims. There needs to be some sort of ebay regulation of this.
I also don't adhere to even a well known dealer saying a coin is a proof without the docs to back it up.
Ok..... rant over.... (TypeMaster is now taking a deep breath)!
Edited by TypeMaster
11/28/2006 3:10 pm
11/28/2006 3:10 pm






















