| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,037 |
|
|
CCF Sponsor
United States
702 Posts |
Another one. I'm a little less insecure about this one. I feel it is under-graded. I hope you agree. "You versus PCGS"   What do you think? At all PL?   Thanks in advance. I'm really interested to see what people both new to Morgans and the old Morgan experts have to say.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
coin needs better lighting...has some flash, could be DMPL.. but not by the photo's....
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I am no pro but I don't think it's a DMPL but I do think it's a PL.Also,the '81's are known for their higher grades. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think this could be a high end MS-63. This coin looks like a Prooflike maybe DMPL depending on the actual depth of reflectivity.
|
|
CCF Sponsor
 United States
702 Posts |
Okay, thanks for the feedback. How could I take better pictures to show the depth of the mirrors?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Okay, thanks for the feedback. How could I take better pictures to show the depth of the mirrors? MS63, and wonderful color. It's very, very difficult to properly image reflectivity in a coin. In order to be considered PL, using your rule as an example, the 9 needs to be clearly readable in the face of the coin when held 4-6" from it. 12pt newspaper type is the standard for measuring such reflectivity. A DMPL coin is one you would be perfectly willing to shave in, using a straight razor.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
MS-63, interesting toning. Would love to have this one for my collection!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6389 Posts |
Looks better than 63 to me, with definite mirrored fields. I'd say MS-64 PL, with DMPL not out of the question. Very strong eye appeal on this one!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
62 PL, but I hope I'm low.
|
|
CCF Sponsor
 United States
702 Posts |
Thank you very much. I appreciate all of your assistance greatly. This is in an OGH that says 63 DMPL, CAC. Based on all of your input, I will not be resubmitting, just hoping when I'm ready to sell her that feels like me that she's rather strong for the grade. I feel it's a clear 64-65 DMPL, but it's probably not worth the effort now, especially as the TPG's continue to get tougher. I'm afraid I significantly overpaid then - $300 to Don Rinkor. I should have made a reasonable but lower offer. He's a good guy and very knowledgeable. I trust him more than a lot of the other dealers I met with and talked to, so if it's a "poor purchase", it's on me. Such is life. That's what I get for trusting my gut when my gut doesn't have any idea what it's looking at!
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,037 |
|