| Author |
Replies: 319 / Views: 63,846 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
@ RED, sorry I just see error about that £1, I don't think anyone has got anything like so close to that first edge insignia in nickel brass. Lead/tin I've no real idea about. Queen's portrait on the £2 is actually not a bad likeness of the real thing, maybe it is a brand new engraving. The closed eye is funny. Meanwhile over in Wales... http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321732032862
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
There's a few more shown up in Wales on ebay, still haven't heard back from my welsh pal so presume he hasn't found one :( Of course, I have those Kitchener fakes to look out for as well now thanks to Andy, and they're a lot harder to spot ! Well, I got this today, from ebay... Was advertised as an error coin, but after a conversation and an offer, I bought it. (The first fake I've ever actually 'bought', which was shortly followed by a fake £2 I'm yet to receive, but it's a good one so watch this space)  Not dissimilar to my disc from the mid-late 90's (below) but this one was found by a postmaster in a bag direct from the post office in 2000. Clearly a more refined disc, although I'm not really sure if there was a point to the milling ? I was surprised at it being so overweight, but the 90's one is over a gram underweight so obviously the mech tech was alot lower then. 
Edited by Red 04/29/2015 4:17 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
What alloys do those ground discs look like, incidentally? Weights are terribly off, but maybe that is to compensate for the alloy so as to fake an electronic reading. Most striking thing about Coin-Mech's fake Kitchener was the missing bottom to the Y (once I noticed it!), https://www.facebook.com/WillingsSe...pe=1&theater but I don't know if they're all like that.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
Have you seen the full pictures of the coin ? Yeah, it's odd, I would hazard a guess that it's missing on them all, simply due to the way the letters 'cross over' the join of the two metals (or rather how they don't cross over at all and end in a blob)
I'll try and get some natural pictures of the discs, but I'd hazard a guess at a higher brass content alloy for the new one, and a high steel/iron for the old disc as just for daftness I checked them with a magnet and it stuck to it !!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1321 Posts |
By coincidence - I was recently given these.... :) 
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
Andy, was that in change? At the same time? I'm also wondering if you see any similarity between the metal in the '£1' planchet and 'new dies' fakes? Also is the '£2' combo like the alloys of a real £2? I ask this because I'm wondering if you are close to the (continuing) source of motto-bearing new dies £2 and maybe new dies £1 if some of those are still being made.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
@ RED, I saw same pictures as you. The example had a smooth edge and that medieval font again on the obverse, this time without a date there and what looked like the real IRB portrait. I presume then, a different factory to the HMS Belfast but they hired in the same typesetter, or have little to hand for physical type of that size.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
701 Posts |
I got another fake £1 coin today, this is starting to cost now  The unusual thing on this one is an applied edge strip which I have tried to show in the pictures. There is a clear terminal to the strip, not sure if you have seen this before on a 2006, it also has the " wood grain " effect on the obverse. Weight - 8.59g    
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
aah yes, sorry, one of the emails was just to me but didn't know which one LOL (It was regarding my local bridge £1's) Compare it to this picture from an ebay seller, the clearest yet of the HMS fakes... some mighty strange font in use on the obverse that never really shows itself in the other pics   My last attempt at getting hold of a bunch of sample £2's from china failed :( (I was asking for 2 of each; HMS Belfast, Britannia, Magna Carta, 2015 Technology and Mary Rose. All from the same seller) Andy; That blank £2 certainly looks very close to real from the picture... the pound not as neat but the processes and machinery is there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1321 Posts |
These both came out of a job lot of tokens on ebay - along with some very similar metal discs to those shown by RED. The £2 might be genuine - It's the edge that I have problems with - it's not milled and has that repeating pattern. (shown here next to the fake blank £1) 
Edited by andyg 04/30/2015 5:44 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
Does that pattern happen to be on it twice, with about a centimetre gap between them ? The pattern is identical, although much clearer than my circulated examples, to the Trevithick Train £2 edge pattern.
Sorry Ten... your post hadn't showed when I posted those giant pics.... I have got at least one with a seam in it like yours, egyptian10 has it, but it's not shown in the pic. Not sure which others do... shame, I've just reorganised (and renumbered, sorry folks) a load of my collection too. I'll have a look tomorrow when logging and sorting some more.
Edited by Red 04/30/2015 7:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1321 Posts |
Thanks Red - I compared to the 2004 edge (below) - the blank piece is not milled and appears to have had the pattern struck twice. Not at sure how this could have happened.  Moral - I don't think we're near the source of the counterfeits here in the Midlands - it's now been several weeks (!) since I last found a fake. I had been picking them up at a rate of about 1 in 100 coins but they seem to have dried up somewhat of late.
Edited by andyg 05/02/2015 05:37 am
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
Oh, and that is a distinct 'stud' on the Queen's ear of coin 1 (Egyptian Arch), which shows up whichever way you light that face. No clear equivalent on coin 2, though that has a pimply cheek.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
ooh that's interesting. COIN1 My 'batch' of fakes didn't have any evidence of the die clash as seen in Coin 1, HOWEVER going back over the images (I STILL need to upload these!) I believe some DO show the spot, albeit faintly (Remember the quality is terrible on these coins) BUT I collected another one locally (below) that I pinned down as from the hoard... and yet on close inspection after reading the above, I found it DOES show the die clash, and possibly the dot too, and yet has the ")" mark in the motto in a different position [The ")" which I believe has been suggested is from the roller rolling the design on?] which means it is not from the same setup or batch, but is using a copy of the same dies and very similar equipment.   The one I spotted on ebay in Essex ( http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/181738952924) shows no die clash but again, could be showing evidence of the dot. COIN2 I haven't come across one with such a prominent rev die clash on the obv. What strikes me as odd is the clash marks between the D.G don't appear to match the rev design They do in a very vague sort of way but not enough to be confident it isn't something else. The greenish-gold tinge is exactly what my hoard showed, although now the coins I managed to keep back seem to have lost it somewhat... and don't feel as slippy anymore... (I even wondered whether this was a coating sprayed on the coins to disrupt the coin mechs and allow the coins to pass through) As for the 'bitty' pathways design... I'm positive I have or have had one of those, will have to have a look and try and see which design it corresponds to.
Edited by Red 05/11/2015 09:53 am
|
| |
Replies: 319 / Views: 63,846 |