Thank you. If those images are full-size, I can grab them right from the thread. If they're smaller than original, I'd sure like the full-size ones.
Quote:
Could you give me more information on the flattened talons?
Here's the scoop: Morgans are known for a wide variance in strike qualities. They were produced at a rate which exceeded anything the Mints had ever done before with coins of that size, and backing off the strike pressure was a good way to extend the life of dies and equipment.
When well-struck, talons are nicely rounded, and have detail - the cuts between "toes" - which extend all the way around them. Importantly, they do not wear as quickly (due to their location) as do the eagle's breast and hair at the ear, which are the places one usually looks for wear on a Morgan. Those are problematic because they also show the effects of a weak strike.
Talons also show weak-strike artifacts, but wear at a different rate. When worn, well-struck talons remain rounded. They don't "flatten" via wear until you're down into the XF or worse range, which isn't important to this discussion because we're talking about the hints which help you to distinguish between a well-struck AU and a weakly-struck Mint State coin.
That's why you look to the talons. If you're undecided about whether you're seeing wear or strike artifacts, talons which still look rounded should make you lean towards wear, while talons which are flattened cause you to lean towards strike.
Of course, this is all at the level of a "hint" rather than a "proof." Like any coin, it's the entirety of both surfaces which need to be factored into an opinion. If this stuff were easy, everybody would be doing it.
