Hey everyone. I find this topic a bit confusing. I believe I have the right info. But just to be sure of that I am looking for clarification on this. Here are the pictures. Thanks for your help on this.
You guys (and I mean everyone, not just males ) PCGS mislabeled them as WAMs when really all 88s have WAMs. He's referring to the RDV-006 with PCGS terms, even though it's incorrect.
Unfortunately, you stepped into what may easily be one of the most confusing naming issues in modern numismatics.
All 1988's have a gap between the A & M of America on the reverse, making them a Wide AM, but a few 1988's have a different reverse design and for an unknown reason PCGS decided to label the variety with the different reverse design a " WAM".
As Coop pointed out, the key pickup on the 1988 " WAM" is actually the different design on the initial FG, not the gap between A & M.
1959-1992 we all WAM. 1992 had a few Close AM, but very few. 1993 All were Close AM. 1994 All the business strikes were Close AM and the Proofs were WAMs. 1998-2000 had year year varieties of miss match on the proof and the business strike: Close AM proofs: Business strike had year varieties also: 1998-2000 Should have been Close AM, but had some Wide AM: All info on one image:
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use