|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register. | Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,348 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1212 Posts |
I've had a few ASEs sent in for me by someone else, who dropped their membership. Really I could probably get a dealer to submit it for me in the perfect world, but they are both suggesting I become a member myself. (For probably one coin a year). So bear with my basic line if questioning. First the membership is $69 for the cheapest membership. Then I place a value of $100 on it (Congrats set ASE). PS I know the box has to stay sealed. So I think the grading is about $20 plus return shipping. If I want the COA slabbed, it's another $20. So if I have it about down, the only questions is how it where do I tell them what label I want, it if I don't say anything it'll just be a blue or brown label. And do they assume I want the "congratulations set" listed on the label? It would be a good assumption since I'm sending in the other in a mint sealed shopping box.
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I would call PCGS and run your questions by them. You're going to be spending a chuck of change regardless. What are your goals/reasons for certification?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1212 Posts |
I'm really just an OGP collector. I've had a few things in the mint shipper that I decided to get graded and was aided by a friend who now decided to drop his membership. The OGP is drastically different this year for the Congratulations Set. So I decided to get 2 sets this year. One for my OGP set and the other I'll get slabbed, mainly as a form of certification that it's a Congrats set ASE.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
Anyone wanting to know about sending in coins for grading needs to read this (often hard to find online) info about the grading company business model...or they stand to lose a lot of money (as many do). https://www.coincommunity.com/colle...t-graded.aspIt was a dealer challenging me to look at how inconsistent the MS70 grade was (obvious ASEs with imperfections are not hard to find) coins) on slabbed ASE's that made me start looking into this many years ago. If you just like slabs, then by all means get them slabbed. But otherwise most of the value goes into the pockets of the graders. 
Edited by Earle42 01/02/2025 7:44 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1212 Posts |
Quote: If you just like slabs, then by all means get them slabbed. Yeah, that's just the thing. For myself I'd almost be happy if they didn't really "grade" it (just call it BU). Everyone respects at least the 3 or so "premium" graders to at least have a modern coin like an ASE to have a correct attribution, (I think is the word) assigned to it. In other words, if it's a Congrats Set, it came to them in a sealed box, and you can trust where it came from. Some of the low ball outfits, probably not so much. So the past Congrats sets (you have to be into ASEs a little to understand) they were in a folder, which you can assume if you see one, it's genuine. It's hard to get that coin out without damaging the folder. Now they are changing the design of the OGP. It's just the normal clamshell with a different COA. So even though I don't have a lot of "stock" in the third party graders, I do find myself wanting to get one of these slabbed, and am thinking getting the COA slabbed while I'm at it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
Quote: you have to be into ASEs a little to understand) Actually I was b/c I love the Walking Liberty Design and also liked the eagle on the REV. But (was it 2019, 2000?) when the US mint literally doubled the price of silver proof eagles (and also silver proof sets), it ruined the series for me. When I see mine, I am automatically reminded of this ridiculous act or price gouging and greed and just cannot put more money into the mint b/c of this. It is a shame b/c I had/have some of the keys. I have been sitting on them since that time, but maybe this spring will get them out of safety deposit and trade them for other coins I would like. But the ASE's I was talking about in my former post were actually direct from the mint in monster boxes. My, then, local dealer said he found over a couple years he consistently got back 23% of the monster box submissions as being MS70. He thought that more coincidence and deliberately started to annually poll his friends and other large dealers (at shows etc.) who also sent in monster boxes. He said all of them found out they were getting back 23% as MS70s. This convinced him the grading companies were just scooping up a random number off the top of the boxes to be MS70s. He challenge me to start looking at MS70 ASEs for obvious marks that should have kept them from being MS70s. He was right. it was not hard to find them. This was all back right when the MS70 slabbed ASE craze (HSN style) was hitting the internet trying to convince people PCGS ASE MS70 slabs would make valuable investments for the future. That entire event of him sharing this info with me started me researching the companies and how they actually operate. The deeper I got, the more I realized if an individual dealer did business like the companies do, that dealer would be blacklisted. I have a number of essays on what I have found, but the following is linked to PCGS website data and shows more than 30% error (by their own stated standards) in the rookie level area of assigning the No FG variety (which they charge extra to do) on Kennedy half dollar slabs. Download and read the essay at the following link. It is a real eye opener and you can check all the data yourself. https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1212 Posts |
Well again, as a general rule, I didn't really care how they grade it. Understanding as much as I do (not a lot, but enough) I will be satisfied with and pretty much expect a 69 grade, maybe 70, but again expect a 69 as being run of the mill. The main reason for the fuss is to get the certification that it came from the Congrats set. I consider the more respected graders PCGS, NGC, and CAC. I don't have an affinity for any of them, but have had a few coins sent to PCGS, but now the friend helped me dropped his membership.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
345 Posts |
Now THAT is funny ... Earle42
Makes one think ... I just can't get around having slabbed coins, for my family, as they would otherwise get far less value for what I leave behind.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1212 Posts |
Looking at it from today's market viewpoint, that is probably correct. Depending on the coin being discussed and the grade. For coins with more, I guess you'd say "numismatic" value, let's say what started out as circulating coinage, yes I believe that's correct. If you look at modern coinage, especially what was issued as a collectors item like the ASEs I collect, I see it as a market that could shift back to coins in their original condition and packaging as possibly being more valuable than slabbed. I believe that aspect of the hobby can be very fickle.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
@Tiny...thanks. I had fun coming up with her. it is unfortunate, but the facts are this is how the companies operate. Social media nowadays has individuals thinking anything slabbed goes for big bucks. And since NGC and PCGS charge a coerced membership fee, the companies make out like bandits off of lot of unsuspecting people. Another interesting study: Only four 1964-D nickels (extremely common date) out of 1,153 submitted got an MS70. Why is that significant? Because anything below MS65 is valued at (PCGS website) 15.00 and below that is 10.00 or less. An MS66 is valued at 65.00. There were 185 out of 1,153 graded at this level. This means that out of the 1,153 nickels graded, 964 at the very most were only worth 15.00! WHo can get a coin graded for only 15.00? In other words, the vast majority of these submitted coins ended up losing the customers money. So let's look at the 185 who got an MS66. How much did they profit? It depends. If they were first time submitters then they lost around 140.00 b/c of the initial membership fee added in to the SH etc. But they got coupons for free submissions! Yup. And in this case the coupons got them a coin worth a whole 15.00 if MS65 (and the numbers show at least half were not up to this level). And even the 185 assigned MS66 would certainly not have brought very much (any?) profit to the submitters. How many of those 15.00 and less slabs were submitted by newbies paying out 200.00 for membership etc.? Overall it's a .003% (4 out of 1,153) chance sending in this coin will bring anything but monetary loss to the submitter. So if the normal collector thinks slabbing coins is going to make them money or bring them value, the stats show otherwise. That is what my friend Penny is all about: Making sure people understand they stand a good chance of being get taken for a ride if they do not do their homework, but instead they just follow modern trends on social media, youtube and ebay. But if someone just likes slabbing their coins, then they are just paying a company to give them what they want to collect. In that case the submitters is just having fun.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4587 Posts |
The economics shade slightly if you bulk submit (100+ coins per invoice of no more than five date/mintmark combinations). Say you submit 3 rolls (120 coins) and set the minimum grade of MS65. Of the 2026 graded, 1036+290+6 or 1,332 (65.7%) will meet that test. Of your 120, then 79 get hollered at ($14 each) and 41 get rejected at $2 each. $1,188 plus the invoice fee and shipping, call it $1,200 or $10 / coin in round numbers. BEST case, you paid face, $6 for the coins, and spend the rejects $2.05 leaving COGS at $1200 + 3.95 = $1,203.95 or $15.24 per coin. Of your 79 holdered coins, likely zero make MS67. 11 make MS66, worth (per price guide) $28 and 68 grade MS66, "worth" $16. Total sales $1,396, profit $192.05. Time to sell 79 coins at shows? 3? 6? 9 days? Works out to about $8/hour. https://www.pcgs.com/services/bulksubmissions
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
The economics shade a lot on coins valued over 4 figures where TPG makes sense in more ways than one. I agree on sub-$1000 coins the submitter is rarely going to "make money". If your goal is strictly economic gain then TPG is not the way to go for the average Joe (like me). When I had some disposable income most of my submissions were for fun, enjoyment and learning about the hobby.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1212 Posts |
Thanks Burton and everyone. I did come up with a work around of sorts.... maybe. There are a few respected sellers on ebay already pre-selling 2025 Congrats set ASEs. The only thing they aren't offering is the COA. The COAs aren't numbered anyway, so if I think I was going to have that slabbed and I think it's worth the $20 to do so, I mean, yeah that's "just me", anyone knowledgeable will know there's no way to prove they were together from the mint anyways. So there is one seller many probably know, Pinehurst. I can reach out to them and ask if they'd get one COA slabbed and then I'd but that and the Congrats ASE from them.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
Quote:The economics shade slightly if you bulk submit (100+ coins per invoice of no more than five date/mintmark combinations). Say you submit 3 rolls (120 coins) and set the minimum grade of MS65. Of the 2026 graded, 1036+290+6 or 1,332 (65.7%) will meet that test. Of your 120, then 79 get hollered at ($14 each) and 41 get rejected at $2 each. $1,188 plus the invoice fee and shipping, call it $1,200 or $10 / coin in round numbers. BEST case, you paid face, $6 for the coins, and spend the rejects $2.05 leaving COGS at $1200 + 3.95 = $1,203.95 or $15.24 per coin. Of your 79 holdered coins, likely zero make MS67. 11 make MS66, worth (per price guide) $28 and 68 grade MS66, "worth" $16. Total sales $1,396, profit $192.05. Time to sell 79 coins at shows? 3? 6? 9 days? Works out to about $8/hour. https://www.pcgs.com/services/bulksubmissions Thanks for this additional info. Don't forget if this is a first time submission (and I have encoutnered newbies wanting to make bulk submissions) then the membership fee drops the profits to (192.05 - 69=) 123.00 at a minimum. If the next levels up are chosen we get profits of 43.05 and -56.95 respectively. I chose the 1964-D specifically since it is so common and could be what a lot of newbies are out there who think they are going to get rich sending in any shiny coin might do. Quote:I agree on sub-$1000 coins the submitter is rarely going to "make money". If your goal is strictly economic gain then TPG is not the way to go for the average Joe (like me). Exactly. Last year I sold an MS65 DDO Walker and had it slabbed b/c the market would maximize profits that way. I do not like this is how the market is b/c it means a company, choosing to use subjectivity to maximize profits off of collectors, is a middleman. But if I didn't get it slabbed, the person who bought it likely would have. And, on the flip side, I actually am happy a fellow collector who likes slabs could add it to their collection. Quote: When I had some disposable income most of my submissions were for fun, enjoyment and learning about the hobby. And that is exactly what a hobby is all about.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1212 Posts |
I looked into CAC. At first looked like a deal, since membership is prorated. I emailed them for more info and then got me with the service fee and a few other bits of info, including that they don't slab the COA and became apparent the PCGS is probably going to be the choice for me. I'tm the meantime, my Congrats sets showed up. So for right now, especially given that I'm not a label chaser and need the early release or things like that on it, I'm just holding it in the shipping box. Maybe I'll wait until about a year from now, I'll get the 2025 Congrats and at least be able to send 2 of them in and the membership cost will at least go into 2 coins instead of one. The return shipping cost is also rather high and I believe that cost applies to 1-5 coins, so the shipping per coin would also be cut.
Edited by Gilly 01/17/2025 09:28 am
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,348 |
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.44 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
| |
| |