| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,526 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
Nice looking coin, MS63 or 64 Brown. Reverse is soft strike or abraded die imo and not wear. Mintmark looks like an RPM.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1584 Posts |
 I need to learn how to zoom in closer.  Edited by noD
01/08/2014 7:43 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
917 Posts |
Oh man noD that is a nice one. I LOVE early Lincolns more than anything else. MS64, but I really don't see any problems with it at all. Sometimes the wood grain hides stuff in pictures. That thing has a GREAT strike!  As for the RPM CC has one listed for 1913 but it doesn't look like the one they have listed, but it's hard to tell. Check it out and see of you see any of the markers for it. http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/...ie_state=eds |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
Thanks LincolnGuy, early BN lincolns really fire me up too. Thanks for the link. I'll have a look.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
Man! This is a great cent! I'm on board too at 64RB. How lustrous is it? Can you talk a little about your lighting and camera setup? I've been working on it too and need to keep learning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
Thanks Rking007. It is a beautiful coin in hand. Still has cartwheel under all the brown. I almost turned it down due to the weak reverse.
I'm no photo expert, or any other type of expert for that matter, but I will post some info about my pics tomorrow in the photo section.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19968 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'm so glad you've perfected your imaging skills, noD - you've proven to have a pretty sharp cross-denomination eye for nice coins.  Although I'm coming around on Lincoln grading, I still lack the eye for AU/BU determination - especially with early ones - so I'll hang from BadThad's opinion in that regard and suggest this one as a 64 that would easily Green Bean. Question for the membership at large - is the noticeable deterioration at TRUST and UNUM (and the wheat stalk) a hub issue? Were it die alignment, the date should be affected but isn't. Or were the dates hubbed? |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
WOW!!..beautiful semi-key.. Easy, MS-64BN |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19968 Posts |
Quote:
Question for the membership at large - is the noticeable deterioration at TRUST and UNUM (and the wheat stalk) a hub issue? Were it die alignment, the date should be affected but isn't. Or were the dates hubbed? The TRUST is from a Grease Filled Die. This is normally NOT weak, i.e. metal flow issue. With the UNUM, this is a case of non-parallel dies and a M/LDS as evidenced by the right wheat stalk. Normally, UNUM is strong as there are never metal flow issues there. The dates were applied to the working hub, as I recall, for all wheat cents as the master hub was the same from 1909-1915. On another note, the master hub was "sharpened" in 1915 (due to wear) and then completely re-tooled in 1916. Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
It doesn't match what I see on coppercoins for this date/MM. There is a slight hit on the upper left of the S. Through my 10x loupe I don't see anything out of the ordinary.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
Its funny you mention the sharpening BadThad because I was just going to comment on how sharp his hair looks compared to other early Wheats like this! The more I look at this coin the more I just love it.
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
Thanks, Thad. That makes sense.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,526 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/08/2014 7:36 pm
