1983 1c DDR-002, WDDR-002, 1-DR-002 Any MS-65+ Trade?

These DD's are from dies mid way through their life span, but very nice nonetheless.

Tenhulz,
After looking my images over, I can see were this could be confusing. My coin is a doubled die and yours is not. If you look at the cent, particularly on the lower right corners of NIT of UNITED, the serif on the center bar of the E of CENT and the upper right serif of the N of CENT; you will see the tell-tale notches of a true doubled die. The rest of the doubling is also obvious as hub doubling (doubled die) to the experienced variety specialist but I can see where it could be confusing. Your coin is one that would have confused me in the fist year I began specializing in die varieties but I had a lot of help which made the learning curve fast.

Hang in there and one day you'll say, oh ya now I see wha they were talking about. In the meantime you will run into some deceptive doubling.

Coop, can you get Tenhulz some comparison images of some tough ones to tell apart? I can really see where his 1983-P quarter would be a tough call for many newer variety guys (and gals). The 1983s are often tough for beginners in this field.

The reverse of the quarter is showing extreme die wear. Note the lines you mentioned. The lines in the field are called die flow lines. It is from a VLDS die. The areas that are catching your eye is the wave of a new Die Deterioration that is moving toward the rim. Note how it only happens on certain devices and not all devices. The ones that have open water towards the rim are the ones making this area. Note the "E P" on the EPU. You see it there and also on the "S" in STATES. If this were hub doubling, then all the devices in that area would show the same amount of doubling.
Here is what hub doubling could look like on a Washington quarter:





I don't see hub doubling going on with your quarter, just extreme die wear. On the LDS/VLDS dies they are often hard to tell what was on the dies in the earlier die states. Hope this helps.

Added a bit of more pointed information. Thanks Ken.

Coop, it looks good to me

Best job of stitching two images together that I've ever seen.

Could have been worked over by a wire brush or aluminum oxide cloth. Getting good shots of this variety were difficult and I'd still like to have better.