| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,554 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
 VF-30 Details.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
XF. This coin has a beautiful look to it. I love the blueish toning around the stars and letters.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
937 Posts |
I grade it WOW!! I assume the heavy scratches are on the holder. I have seen far too few of these to claim to know a grade my guess is VF obverse fine Reverse I would be proud to own it. It wis older than any of my US coins, and I like it!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
937 Posts |
Now that I look at other's grades looks like I am lowballing again.  Guess I am just a tough old bird.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
OK, I've gone after this attribution twice and come up empty-handed. Could someone else have a go and see what you come up with? I tried a few forks in the Wizard, and neither conclusion of B-10 or B-22 - the only iterations which worked - seem to agree with this coin. http://www.earlydollars.org/wizardhome.htm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
EF details - not due to the hairlines which seem to be on the holder but toning seems to indicate an old cleaning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
Dave I tried the wizard twice. I've never attempted an attribution of a Bust Dollar however that wizard was slick. I am not 100% of my end result, but I came up with
B-9
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1959 Posts |
I came up with B-9 also. R-1.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
Details appear to be around VF-25.
I also gave the wizard a shot and came up with BB-166, B-9.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1132 Posts |
I agree 100% with Fenton. XF cleaned. You'll be hard pressed to find an 18th century example without ANY evidence of a past cleaning; so this detriment is minimal in my book. Simply stunning. 
Edited by CopperCastle 08/31/2015 11:36 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
The color of the coin does not indicate cleaning to me. Coindog, What does the PCGS code indicate the reason for being a details coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
917 Posts |
I think the only difference between B22 and b9 is the gap between the bust and the stars. OLCoins its a 92. In hand it is very noticable. I'm so bad at taking pictures that I can make a cleaned coin look unclean ha ha. Thanks everyone for the input.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
OK, I erred in my evaluation of the right star positions. The die crack after the S in STATES is diagnostic, such that someone who knew more about these than I (in other words, your average 9 year old) should be able to attribute it on sight.  Very late die state with the crack developed through AMERICA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
604 Posts |
Quote: You'll be hard pressed to find an 18th century example without ANY evidence of a past cleaning; so this detriment is minimal in my book. Simply stunning.  I initially put the grade at VF-30 but to be realistic I feel it is more of a VF-25. The scratches on the plastic and glare from the light make it hard to see clearly. Regardless of the grade I like it and it is on my "when I strike it rich" list
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,554 |
Page 2 of 2
|