Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Basement Job Getting Bids........

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,183Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1984 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  11:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Smallcentguy to your friends list
I am having second thoughts on this one.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2519 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  12:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Altaira to your friends list
The raised second (and third?) "rim" says hammer job.
Formerly nancyc
Australia
5385 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  4:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Nevol to your friends list
Most 'garage' aka basement jobs we see here in Oz have a reverse image bashed onto them.

I'm not saying this coin is legit, but how would it get a positive image by having another coin banged onto it.

The seller clearly shows in their images that the planchet is way thinner than a 'normal' one. Maybe mint sport.

Might be time for another opinion.
life is a mystery to be lived not a problem to be solved
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  5:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add trout1105 to your friends list
I am calling this genuine.
Every other shed job, vise job or hammer job I have seen has an incused design on the coin.
This is not the case with this particular coin and the planchet is incredibly thin compared to a regular coin.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2519 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  5:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Altaira to your friends list
A "raised" design can be done with counterfeit soft dies. Make an impression of a coin on another piece of metal (the "die"), then hammer that "die" on a coin.

The reduced thickness is because the obverse had been ground down.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1620 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  5:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnnysprawl to your friends list
doesn't look legit to me.

You can see where the rim was originally formed on the obverse and was either ground down as SlurExe97 said or was flattened in a vice or press...
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  6:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Debrajc to your friends list
I am "leaning" genuine but I could be wrong.
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  6:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list
I don't see how you're going to grind a coin down to one-third original thickness and leave the portrait and legends visible on the obverse.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  10:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
My take on this coin is that it is a split planchet. After striking, it failed to eject and another blank planchet entered the chamber. The reverse struck up nicely on the second strike although off center but the obverse was covered by the blank planchet effectively obliterating most of the original obverse strike. Plus the original obverse strike was likely weak to begin with because it is such a thin planchet. IMHO
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9864 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  11:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list
robmck1967, to me that sounds like a plausible scenario.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Moderator
Learn More...
Canada
10458 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2017  4:39 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list

Quote:
robmck1967, to me that sounds like a plausible scenario.


Not a chance...

There is no evidence of a "second strike" in the places where you would expect to see preservation of the devices (in the recesses of the dies, in their centre). Any second strike that was strong enough to obliterate a rim, would also remove the beads and most of the other devices from the first strike. What are the odds of having no rotation in collar betweens strikes, unless it was a cap on the reverse die?

If the first strike was that weak with a split planchet, then how did a fully formed rim happen on both sides of the coin (you can see the flattened rim on the obverse too)? Coins struck on split planchets have very distinctive textures, which in part are formed from the rolling of the metal strips - that is completely absent.

When a coin is struck and then sandwiched with a blank planchet (which is how brockage strikes are formed), the capped coin has a convex cap edge form where the metal is stretched on the edge of the hammer die, and the blank planchet that was struck, does get a mirror image brockage, but also has a cupped concave cap edge. The force of the dies forces the metal up around the hammer die and around the coin stuck to it.

Lastly, note that one strike that was "off-centre" a bit. Remember that the raised rim element and the 12-sided shape is formed by the collar die - please explain how is it possible to have a raised rim element, which includes the 12-sided shape (look below the word CANADA) well into the fields of the coin?

If the collar was there, it would be strongly impressed into the coin on one side (assuming it was sitting on a blank planchet, creating a spoon-like shape.

Basement-Job-Getting-Bids........
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2017  6:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
I try to walk through it in my mind but obviously I am no expert and have limited knowledge of the minting process.

But tell me how this coin could be a basement job? It is so thin that I would think you would lose all of the obverse details if you ground half of the coin away. Plus you would have to make a soft die to create the reverse design the way it is double or triple struck.

Yes, I have a hard time imagining how this could be done at the mint but I have just as hard a time imagining how this was made in a basement. Please enlighten us!
Moderator
Learn More...
Canada
10458 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2017  11:45 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list
Don't think in terms how it was made in the garage - think in terms of how can this possibly be made at the mint? (which is why I worded my earlier reply as questions).

Again, how does one get a 12-sided impression of the rim itself (the 12-sided rim feature is formed by the collar die) way out in the fields of the coin? It is physically impossible.

This, is what you should have seen: http://goccf.com/t/267141

Then, study any number of legitimate double-struck 1-cent coins to see how the second strike almost obliterates the first strike, especially on the fields of the second strike (highest part of the die).

My interpretation? This was originally an error coin struck on a thin planchet (not a split planchet). Then, someone tried to make a "better error" out of it...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2017  7:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
It appears that this listing has been removed. Last I saw it was up to $36. I wonder if this was removed by ebay or the seller?
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2017  8:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list
I noticed it was removed too, and unfortunately I didn't save off the images. It kind of makes me sad in a way. I mean, take a cent in your hand, visualize the planchet one-third the thickness, and ask yourself, really? Hammer job? With all the odd stuff that can happen at the mint? If it was faked, that's some quality work. Maybe the seller should have made forty bucks on it. Let's see, I gotta produce some soft dies (but with tiny denticles) and shave two-thirds of the obverse off and then somehow punch a super-weak obverse and triple-punch the rim and denticles... but it will be worth it! (Sorry in advance for the sarcasm)
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,183Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums