| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 1,963 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6370 Posts |
Thanks all for your opinions!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1963 Posts |
I say a 64. I have many PCGS MS 64's that look nicer than your coin and ANACS will not grade a 65.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
The obverse does not look 65 in these images. The fingerprint and disturbances in the lower left obverse hold it to 64 IMO. 1881-S pieces are often expected to be pristine at the gem level because so many of them are pristine and that hurts too.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Not 65.....64 tops,just not enough blaze or luster for 65.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Quote:
The obverse does not look 65 in these images. The fingerprint and disturbances in the lower left obverse hold it to 64 IMO. 1881-S pieces are often expected to be pristine at the gem level because so many of them are pristine and that hurts too. So coins are graded on proportion now? So if coin A has 200 in MS-65 and coin B has 20, what would qualify as an MS-65 for coin B would be an MS-64 for coin A? That is starting to be the case for early US coins. Apparently there are not enough true MS capped bust halves, so they are bumped from AU to MS. Now if a common-date Morgan has the slightest bit of wear, it gets AU-55 because there are too many MS coins. A Barber half with the same amount of wear would get AU-58 or higher because there are not enough true AU-58's. If this was an 1893 S, it would be an easy MS-65/66. This makes no sense. What gives? Where is the consistency? |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11909 Posts |
Of course TPGs are swayed by market forces. There are no perfectly objective and consistent coin graders, just like there are no perfectly objective and consistent judges. We are human and reality is complex.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com |
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I must be old school, because a grade is a grade regardless of what type or date the coin is. I see a grade as a technical observation and then there is eye appeal. IMHO. John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote:
This makes no sense. What gives? Where is the consistency? The lower half of the obverse is the prime focal area for Morgans and that area does not look like a MS65 to me. If it were in a MS65 holder (and it certainly could be) I would say it is low end for the grade. 1881-S Morgans are common at the gem level and above; that being the case many collectors paying 65 money have numerous solid gem pieces to choose from. I did not mean to imply that 1881-S Morgans are held to a higher standard per se. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1963 Posts |
The eye appeal on this one is just a bit too iffy to make 65.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 1,963 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/26/2017 4:47 pm
