| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 4,092 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
867 Posts |
62....maybe 63.Removed in appropriate comment. There are young numismatics on this forum that don't need to read that.
Watch what you say-echizento
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9164 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
solid ms-63 outside chance at ms -64
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
324 Posts |
I'd say a solid MS-62. MS-63 if you're lucky. Great eye appeal - I love it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
31 Posts |
Thanks for all the input on this as well, I will note this as a MS-61/62...being a little conservative. I will be posting his 1890 and 1870 for inputs next.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
I suspect this coin looks better in hand. Flash picks many things up. MS-64 for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
849 Posts |
I am not a great grader but I am impressed with that coin. I was gloating because I own a 1948 EF40 ICCS graded fifty cent piece. This coin you are displaying is way out of my league (and budget)!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21630 Posts |
Great looking coin. Wish mine looked that good.
Your Dad has a great eye when purchasing coins.
Looking forward to more pictures.
FYI-
That 1948 is the Narrow Date 4/4 variety.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3049 Posts |
I'm at 62.... I think it's too choppy on the effigy for a 63 or higher
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
I'm at 62 on this one. Fields are too marked up to be any higher.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 4,092 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/06/2017 5:36 pm
