| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,299 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
It's possible it is a post-strike delamination, but I would expect some of the reverse design to show through, even if just a tiny bit. The ridges are fairly regular, as well, leading me to believe that it was intentionally tooled/machined. Maybe someone started to make a Magician's coin and gave up.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I do not think the mint even waffled coins way back then. It looks like some kind of PMD. Maybe Mike would like to see it? John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm no expert, but isn't that pattern awfully regular for a split planchet? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
 Note how the edge is not as deep as the trenches? If it was done by machine, then that would not rise near the edge. The compression of the strike on the edge must have prevented this area from not being as shallow as the center as the coin. Also if it were machined, it would be smooth. Not showing pock marks in the affected areas. 
Edited by coop 10/17/2020 2:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
There is no way this is a split planchet. This was done by grinding. Hence the lite weight. It's to perfect to be a random split. There would be some of the design left ether pre strike or after strike. And as far as one side being left, it wasn't held square to grinder.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Seems illogical to me, but I don't argue with coop. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Where is Mike  John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
443 Posts |
I've sent this coin to Mike for his analysis, will post results when I hear back from him. Pictures are very hard to review, so an in hand exam by Mike I felt was warranted. I truly appreciate everyone's input! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Very much looking forward to the reply.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4406 Posts |
The ridges being perfectly even and symmetrical make me doubt this is a split planchet.
The obverse looks suspiciously weak too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1667 Posts |
I think it was hit with a tile back groove cutting machine along the course of it's life, could also be done with a drainer groove cutter, could have been quite a few tools to do this but I think it was a long while ago in my opinion.
Looks way to mechanical and intentional to be a planchet split or huge lamination.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
443 Posts |
Well the word back from Mike Diamond was PMD 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Well then,case solved. John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54283 Posts |
The mint didn't start waffling coins until 2003, according to Coin World.
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,299 |
Page 2 of 2
|