| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,538 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
Think it might squeak into 63. obverse looks PL but its difficult to tell if the reverse is from these pics, I'm leaning towards no
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
MS-62, possibly low 63, no PL.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
I'm in the MS62 box as well
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5683 Posts |
Pretty deep scars on that head, I'd also say MS-62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7078 Posts |
I'll be optimistic and say 63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2342 Posts |
I think the light washed out to PL appearance of the reverse as opposed to the obverse.
Lots of chatter and dings.
MS63PL for me
smat
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
MS63 no PL.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Valued Member
 United States
127 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
63 surprises me, but I've always thought that submitting to PMGs is usually a crapshoot.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18706 Posts |
just me personally but I wouldnt pay MS63 $$ for this coin. especially since you can find so many nice 63 examples of one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
Not an appealing obverse, I say it keeps it at MS60
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3667 Posts |
Ignoring the scuffs on the slab, there are quite a few heavy contact marks and fingerprints. I'd call this MS-62. I think the 63 is a bit generous, possibly an eye appeal adjustment. Back in the day, this would have been considered SPL, but I don't see enough from the photos to call it PL today. The photos could be hiding enough to make it PL, but from what I can see, it doesn't look like it. IMHO, they got the no designation right.
Edited by fortcollins
12/09/2020 9:07 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,538 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/29/2020 12:37 pm
