| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 4,442 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
you should listen to others as well. Stop reporting things you do not know or understand.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
54283 Posts |
If you are talking to me, I didn't report it. I'm just trying to understand how it could come into being at the mint.
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1186 Posts |
Looks legit, but it's definitely not from the 1960s. I am about 99.9% sure it is either 1980 or 1981. That effigy and legend is not found on any 1960's Canadian small cents. These are the effigies and legends used from 1965 to 1981 
Finding and discovering modern Canadian doubled die varieties since 2018. 2023 Recent Publications: Modern Canadian Doubled Die Varieties - First Edition PDF & Paperback https://www.mcddv.ca (website currently down for maintenance as of 08/01/2024)
|
|
Moderator
  United States
54283 Posts |
Sold for $125.95
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10463 Posts |
Yes. I bought it.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Moderator
  United States
54283 Posts |
OK, draw me a picture as to how this got made. Please.
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10463 Posts |
Wait until I have it in hand.
What I will say, however, is why I bid so aggressively on this coin. I suspect this involves two coins/blanks. Whether it is overlapping planchets or maybe a planchet with an incomplete punch coming apart in the striking chamber. The photos were pretty crappy, and I am quite excited to see it up close. This error would be so much cooler if the second coin involved making this one could ever be found.
It was definitely struck at the mint, and whether or not "mint sport" was involved might be impossible to tell.
I'll post better photos once I get it.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Valued Member
United States
460 Posts |
I am in the corner with Johnnysprawl. Two overlapping blank planchets struck at same time. One on center, the other off center. The thickness of both planchets "piled up" caused significant design weakness/blank area due to the double thickness preventing the design to be struck up where there was only one planchet layer. The only thing that looks suspicious is that there is some design showing on one side while the corresponding other side is blank. However, it appears that the struck portion is very weak on the one side and gets even weaker as it gets closer to rim area. There may have been some pressure/metal flow from the double planchet strike area flowing to the single planchet area. My opinion is that the strike pressure had to be low in order for my explanation to be valid since coins get struck through off center blanks all the time but rarely look like this.
Edited by Zimmy 01/14/2021 9:28 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts |
ahh....so that's who I was bidding against! well I am glad it went to a good home. looking forward to a full explanation when you receive it SPP.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1472 Posts |
I was tempted SPP, but I knew if you were looking at it you would have a STRONG bid in. Glad you the man!! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
  United States
54283 Posts |
Note how the obverse on this one is little changed compared to the other one. 
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
Yes, but you can still see the weakness on the obv by 'Regina' where the two planchets were not overlapping each other (assuming thats what happened). Its just not as pronounced
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
The just posted coin appears to be struck through late stage cap hence the weakness of part of the obverse. Different causes between the two coins.
Edited by nickelsguy 01/15/2021 6:58 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
98 Posts |
Congratulations SPP, it's a great mind bender of a coin.
I think it's either a single strike with 2 planchets or the coin was struck normally, but only partially ejected, then another planchet was introduced and both were struck again, which would make your coin double struck but not the other.
Either way there should be a reverse image of your coin out there, would be amazing if you could find that one as well.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 27 / Views: 4,442 |
Page 2 of 2
|