| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,992 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
62 The flat spot on eagle's breast appears to have happened during the minting process.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19210 Posts |
MS62+ for me--I suspect AGA didn't opt for pluses. The eagle doink is curious--thinking it's a die issue. Everyone, pull out you'85 Os and take a look.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
AGA-63. Strong strike for the date, but I would say MS-62
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
I have to call it au58 due to the eagles breast and the high points of the hair.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
MS62 given the number of obverse and rim hits
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
My 85 O has the same breast marking
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18696 Posts |
decent strike for this year. not enough hits for a 62 grade. not clean enough for a 64. by process of elimination I'm at MS63. albeit on the lower end
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
Thanks for the responses! Sidekick, could I see a photo? That is interesting, I wonder how many coins have the same mark? Maybe it was only 100, or maybe 10,000. I found this from doing a google search: http://goccf.com/t/6068Also, it's not often I disagree with the majority on here but I do think it cannot be MS62. The breast dent is clearly due to the die, so therefore should not affect the numerical grade, and only damage and wear to the coin after it was minted is surely relevant? The coin in hand is really nice, and the strike is really good. The scratches on the cheek look worse on the close up photos but they are not deep at all. I personally grade is MS63+. I've got a couple of MS62s to compare it to and they have much more wear and less lustre. This TPG actually gave it a MS65! But we know they are hardly accurate.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Quote: Sidekick, could I see a photo? PCGS coin. They gave it a 64 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
Ahh so an ms63 if a die marking.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Very interesting variety or possible mint error on the reverse. As for grade, I'd say a strong 63. Nice luster but she's a bit baggy.
Edited by fenton 08/12/2021 7:30 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Don't see anything listed on VAMWORLD which would fit this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9793 Posts |
I think it's an MS62 myself. Too much chatter on the cheek to go any higher. Quote: Don't see anything listed on VAMWORLD which would fit this. This wouldn't be a VAM just due to the reverse spot of strike weakness or strike through. IT has to be on the die itself, a abject interfering with the strike can't be part of the die like say a die gouge would be. Hence no VAM specific for that, but rest assured it's a VAM as all Morgan and Peace dollars are. Only not one with added collector interest for a specific die combination or variety. There are a lot more common VAMs than there are desirable ones, for sure.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18696 Posts |
its hard to get this coin to 64 in anyones book. not sure what happened there
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,992 |
Page 2 of 2
|