| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,131 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
I am at 1926 D. Ty2020b convinced me based on ribbon position.
Edited by Slider23 06/12/2022 1:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7628 Posts |
The circular damage marks in the center on the reverse look like coin counter/roller damage and render the coin to cull status.
A great candidate for a short Nic-a-Date treatment or a long soak in vinegar to restore the date.
Either way, treated or untreated, it is still only worth 10 cents.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2282 Posts |
westernsky-So your guess on the date is what?
Don't be mistaken folks, this was just a fun post to see what your guess is on the date of this coin
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW 06/11/2022 10:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
19-something. I think damage just randomly looks like a 2.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
92 Posts |
The straight back on the last digit, left ribbon style, and position of the last digit overlapping the left ribbon make it almost certainly 1926 D, I agree with Westernsky and JTCC.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
600 Posts |
Don't get me wrong...I think it is cool and all...but sometimes I wonder if folks maybe know a little TOO much about coins if they can figure out the date from a coin like this. Impressive.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7516 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Based on the design of the ribbon alone we can eliminate anything before 1926. Strike and die state really are no help as the entire 20's had issues with these. In 1926 the ribbon placement, curvature, and thickness was changed. If it were a 1920 the ribbon would curve closer to the braid and not overlap the last digit in the date. My money is on 1926 D. You can make out the top portion of the 6 where the ribbon passes through, with a hit to the center of the 6 which is causing some distortion to the lower portion of the 6. 1926-D
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7628 Posts |
NewmismaticsFTW - LIke I said early in the thread yesterday, I think the coin is a 26-D.
Over the years I've looked at thousands upon thousands of part date and no date Buffalos. After a while certain features start to stand out. On this one the last digit's straight left side just looks likes part of a "6" to me.
It cannot be a "1"as the mint did not make 21-D dated Buffalos that year.
Edited by westernsky 06/12/2022 12:06 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2282 Posts |
I didn't want to give my opinion originally because that would skew things.
I deduced it to a 26-D as well.
This was fun and I've learned a few new things about this series, thank you all!
westernsky- Oops, I didn't see your earlier post on what date you had said
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Valued Member
United States
92 Posts |
You know what? I completely missed the Denver mintmark. It thought it to be a 1921, and I apologize.
I should know better than to rush in and make comments.
Pete
Edited by BuffaloIronTail 06/12/2022 3:17 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
425 Posts |
I remember way back when I was a kid, alright no laughing. There was a little bottle of something my Dad and I bought and you would put it on a dateless Buffalo nickel and it brought out the date. That was pretty good back in the days. Then we would put it in the album. Now days you would ruin the coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97435 Posts |
You folks astound me. I actually learned something just now
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,131 |
Page 2 of 2
|