| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,616 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
Just picked this up. Looks to be a good set. The nickel also looks to have all its steps. Your thoughts   |
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Nice, be real nice if 43/42!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
We need large straight-on, in focus closeups of each coin to make a reasonable determination.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
Looks like a very nice set. Good choice.  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Really tough to tell from those photos. I don't see anything that stands out as distracting.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
NOT a mint set, just one each of the Philadelphia issues that someone has put in a capital plastics holder. No true mint sets until 1947 (In my opinion) and they were double sets with two coins of each denomination from each mint.
I say this because you DON'T want to pay any knid of a premium just because it says it's a "mint set".
Edited by Conder101
03/16/2017 1:46 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
705 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Conder is spot-on. Larger, close-up pics would be necessary for worthwhile grading opinions.  to the CCF! |
|
Valued Member
 United States
421 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7627 Posts |
I don't see anything earth shattering. An average unc (60 to 63) P grouping like that should retail for something around 60 to 75$ in my opinion. Nice set in a nice holder!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
A fine looking set but, as some have noted, that's not original mint packaging. That said, the quality of coins is what one would expect in an UNC mint-issued set. My guess is the coins were pulled from quality BU rolls, typically 60-63 grades, to assemble these sets.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,616 |
|
Posted 03/15/2017 6:23 pm
