Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 449 |
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
517 Posts |
Hello all, Grade opinions welcome.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1050 Posts |
MS-65 I'll say. nice coin.
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
8411 Posts |
MS65, nice rare NGC black holder.
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
4583 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
55821 Posts |
I'll say technically a 65 but not really a fan.
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
1635 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
1694 Posts |
Nice looking lady - MS 64
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4491 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
2178 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2891 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4214 Posts |
Going out on a limb here...MS-66+...I like it.. 
I'm by no means a pro and will never claim to be...just my 2 cents A smile costs nothing to give or receive....GF If it's not hockey, it's not a sport
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
565 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1040 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9927 Posts |
typical bold strike for this year. nice overall luster. AVG+ eye appeal with just a hint of gold. I'm not seeing any serious hits just some chatter from other coins. the coin should grade MS65 but I have one just like this from PCGS that I thought would grade at least 65 and it came back as MS64
|
Valued Member
United States
214 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
1915 Posts |
A lot of what appears to be contact marks on the obverse is actually metal flow due to the die state. Other than the N-S gash just west of the ear, the obverse contact marks would be consistent with MS-65. The gash likely holds the obverse to MS-64/MS-64+. The reverse is solid. I do not see anything that would hold the reverse below MS-66. Giving a bit more weight to the obverse, I think this would net grade to MS-65.
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 449 |
|