| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,609 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
Hello all, Grade opinions welcome.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1530 Posts |
MS-65 I'll say. nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
MS65, nice rare NGC black holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say technically a 65 but not really a fan.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
Nice looking lady - MS 64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7063 Posts |
Going out on a limb here...MS-66+...I like it..  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18689 Posts |
typical bold strike for this year. nice overall luster. AVG+ eye appeal with just a hint of gold. I'm not seeing any serious hits just some chatter from other coins. the coin should grade MS65 but I have one just like this from PCGS that I thought would grade at least 65 and it came back as MS64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
A lot of what appears to be contact marks on the obverse is actually metal flow due to the die state. Other than the N-S gash just west of the ear, the obverse contact marks would be consistent with MS-65. The gash likely holds the obverse to MS-64/MS-64+. The reverse is solid. I do not see anything that would hold the reverse below MS-66. Giving a bit more weight to the obverse, I think this would net grade to MS-65.
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,609 |
Posted 02/19/2021 3:42 pm
