Your coin is a violently damaged cent. It was not, is not, and never will be any kind of error coin. It certainly is not what you claim it to be.
Here, apparently, is the error-ref.com entry you claim it looks "nearly identical" to:
https://www.error-ref.com/struck_th...age_die_cap/Your coin does not look "nearly identical" to it. It bears a superficial similarity to one of the three examples, only in that something has worn away the obverse design completely. The giant knicks, gouges and scratches clearly point to mechanical damage. Occam's Razor suggests all of the oddities on this coin are likely to be caused by a single cause - in this case, whatever did the mechanical damage.
But since you aren't apparently willing to listen to anything contrary to your already-formed opinion, let's do some scientific tests. If my hypothesis is correct, that amount of wear should have caused significant loss of weight. If your hypothesis is correct, it should weigh the same as a normal cent. So, weigh your coin on a 2 decimal point balance and then we can discuss options.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis