Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop CCF Members on eBay! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

PCGS MS-65 1884-CC Morgan: How Can It Be?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 2,900Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
115 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2011  9:05 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add rexvictor to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello everyone,

Please weigh in on this grading:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1884-CC-GSA...t_500wt_1125

Beautiful reverse, but those marks in front of her face combined with the borderline unattractive toning are too much for an MS65. Bad photography is probably part of it, but what do you think?
Valued Member
silverguy's Avatar
United States
109 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2011  10:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silverguy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That is an awesome Morgan. MS65 Yes. I think the pic is questionable and is showing more than is really there. I have 2 65's and one ms64. This is a MS65 in my book.

I would love to own her. To expensive for me know though. I am going to spend my extra coin stash on the 25th anniversary ASE set.
Pillar of the Community
Canadian-Banknotes's Avatar
Canada
4944 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2011  11:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Canadian-Banknotes to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think that the first image is a better (in hand) representation of the coin than the second. Sometimes, a camera can pick up to much detail and make the coin look more worn than it really is.

Based on the first picture, I would say it is an MS-65.
Pillar of the Community
fenton's Avatar
United States
4989 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2011  11:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fenton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Monster luster and virtually mark free definitely a 65 - toning is not bad - demonstrates the coin has never been dipped
Valued Member
United States
115 Posts
 Posted 10/24/2011  01:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rexvictor to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for helping me understand this one....I went back and looked at the picture more carefully and saw that the toning in the field in front of the portrait actually gave the appearance of a scuff.

Is it safe to assume that any GSA labelled coin (whether in the original holder or transferred to an NGC/PCGS holder) has the absolutely original surfaces? The toning here also confirms that, but to my eye it is a bit distracting. Toning on GSA coins, though, seem to be somewhat uncommon, probably due to the larger bags they were kept in compared to other hoards.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2011  4:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eddiespin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That coin is every bit a MS65. As you note, those heavy marks are luster grazes. On the toning, if the coin was GSA-holdered like that, it wasn't in an "Uncirculated Silver Dollar" holder. GSA put those coins as well as the coins it opined showed circulation wear into "Silver Dollar" holders.
Pillar of the Community
doubleeagle59's Avatar
Canada
2495 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2011  4:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add doubleeagle59 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I for one can't understand the ms65 grade.

Look at the huge gash mark on the forehead.

It boggles my mind how the US TPG's reward an inferior coin (by bumping the coins' grade up one point)for its luster and some 'special' crescent toning.
Valued Member
silverguy's Avatar
United States
109 Posts
 Posted 12/31/2011  10:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silverguy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
doubleeagle59,

I do not see a "gash" in the forehead?

This coin is without question MS65. That coin is far from inferior.
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 01/02/2012  10:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd probably grade this coin MS-64, personally. Its still reasonably nice but it does have a gash near the eye.
Pillar of the Community
cc99999's Avatar
United States
1302 Posts
 Posted 01/03/2012  02:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cc99999 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's a big coin, it will have gashes. Toning is not a factor in grading unless the toning is artificial, corrosive, or really kills the eye appeal. I've seen MS-66 coins with scratches and gashes.
Pillar of the Community
D0ubl3Eagle's Avatar
United States
5854 Posts
 Posted 01/03/2012  6:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add D0ubl3Eagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can't say for sure if the coin is graded correctly because of potential imperfections that the toning may be hiding but my feeling is that this coin is a lower end example.
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 01/06/2012  03:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS-66 shouldn't have substantial hits, only very light occasional ones out of the focal areas. If one is graded MS-66 with that its graded incorrectly.
Pillar of the Community
United States
684 Posts
 Posted 01/16/2012  11:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Westwood Arms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is this a bad photo of the obverse? If not, not ms65. The eagle side looks nice.
Bedrock of the Community
Bryan1315's Avatar
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 01/17/2012  2:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Is it safe to assume that any GSA labelled coin (whether in the original holder or transferred to an NGC/PCGS holder) has the absolutely original surfaces?

I would say as a rule of thumb the answer is yes. The coin has to be sent in with the GSA slab intact in order to get the GSA Label from PCGS so it should be original. With that being said they can be opened without doing damage if you are real careful and lucky but most people that have them do leave them in the cases as they are just another Morgan without the GSA c ASE
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 2,900Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums