| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,547 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1042 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
I don't see a mintmark. The coin has some wear, but I think even with that, it should show a partial mintmark.
Edited by Fuzzy317
11/07/2011 10:35 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
Oh boy, that's tough to call. I think maybe I see an S and then I wonder if I'm seeing damage. If it is an S it looks tilted so that makes me think there isn't really a mint mark.
I'll check back to see what the experts say.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
i am guessing 14 plain with some dings below the year
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
 A 14 with dings where a mm would be. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1659 Posts |
I think it's only a 14. The mint mark is usually clear on well worn examples that I have seen.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
155 Posts |
I'm seeing a ghost of an S
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3345 Posts |
Not seeing anything-I believe it would be clearer.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
458 Posts |
I see the imprint of an S, but it could be a coincidence.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
968 Posts |
If that was an S it would be about as big as the numbers in the date. I believe a real mint mark during that time would me noticeably smaller than the date numbers.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
257 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1358 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
439 Posts |
As soon as I saw the photo I thought "1914 with some dings."
It happens to me too. Next time you'll get it.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,547 |
|
Posted 11/07/2011 10:33 pm
