| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 2,918 |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
Is it as dark in hand as the photos depict? Can't see many detracting marks, at least nothing that catches my eye and shouts out, looks relatively clean, nice strike, how is the luster? MS 64 for now Nice looking 83 O vermont  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Nice strike for a New Orleans. I'm going to say MS63 if it's an old holder and MS64 if it's a newer one.  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
At least 64, maybe 65. Nice one Dave!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
Good strike, smooth cheek, and very few marks says MS-65 to me. Luster seems weak in the photos which might hurt a bit. I could see 64 if luster is not full.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
I agree with the others, MS-64 but could be a 65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1934 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
southsav, not as dark. Little more "white" than the photos.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
264 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
299 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
I'll wait for a couple more than reveal :)
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
474 Posts |
I am fairly conservative on grading, especially with a coin series where I have very little experience, ie: the Morgan dollar series. I will go MS62 or MS63. Nice coin though! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
63+ obv (those 2 hits are distracting) 64 rev.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
This would more than likely get a 63 or 64 today.  swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
264 Posts |
Wow, didn't see that one coming. I take it you feel it is undergraded instead of a slider? Reminds me of my 1902 s  Edited by Landon
02/18/2012 9:55 pm
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,918 |
Posted 02/18/2012 10:50 am
