| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,335 |
|
|
Valued Member
474 Posts |
I have these 2 1954-D, dimes. They are likely from the same roll (their cert. numbers are consecutive) and both are graded NGC MS67. Could this be 'die' doubling or just 'machine' doubling. I am not aware of any variety for the 1954-D Roosevelt dime.   
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
To much glare to see for sure but it looks like MD. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 474 Posts |
Do these images help? I don't understand how it can be Machine Doubling? Considering the differences between the two pictures, it looks like it is getting worse. 
|
|
Valued Member
 474 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 474 Posts |
Thanks John1 That post sure helps a lot as I seem to come across these coins everyday. A great piece of instruction!
|
|
Valued Member
 474 Posts |
OK, lets try this again. After having read, studied and re-read the awesome illustration and information in the above link posted by John1, I have another example...
Here is the date on my 1861 Seated Liberty dime (Breen Type B-3322) The only variety information I have found is the Breen 'Type I, 5 Line Shield' & 'Type II, 6 Line Shield.'
To me, there looks to be clear notching, especially at the bottom of the second '1.' Does that make this coin a doubled die or could it be an over date, etc...  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I don't know much about your dime but my first thought is it's a re- punched date. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
83 Posts |
Hey Flip, I believe the 1956 Jefferson is actually Die Deterioration and not machine or die doubling. As for the two dimes, I can't make it out too well, but I know that dime reverses along that left branch are pretty notorious for MD. I'm not sure why.
|
|
Valued Member
 474 Posts |
Thanks for the info Rob213 and to CCF !
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,335 |
|