| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 2,471 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
155 Posts |
What year did the silver content of 50 cent pieces change? I have a number of 50 cent pieces from the 1965, 1972, 1979, 1980. Just curious about their value. They are all Mint state.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
1967 is the last year that contains silver. At today's silver price ($32.51) they have a silver value of about $9.75.
Other than your 1965, the otheres you have don't have silver content.
I'll let someone else respond regarding the numismatic values.
Edited by canuck1us 03/27/2012 4:00 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Don't some of the 1968 issues have .500 silver?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
834 Posts |
BF,
only some of the 1968 $0.25 and $0.10 were 50% silver.
|
|
Previously Ousted
Canada
398 Posts |
swrbxx
You now opened a can of very slippery worms......... How does one identify the 50 % and 80 % silver so one can be sure 100%?
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
227 Posts |
|
|
Previously Ousted
Canada
398 Posts |
Barie, it is not the value..... it is HOW do you determine if it is 50 or 80%...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1984 Posts |
There is another thread on this somewhere. The ringing sound caused by dropping the coin is different.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
You can't economically or practically determine if '67 quarters or dimes are 50% or 80%,Canadian bullion buyers split the difference and buy '67s at a price of 65% silver content. '67 fifty cents are 80% silver,'68 fifty cents are nickel
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
834 Posts |
I heard something interesting the other day that any proofset 1967 quarters or dimes are in fact 80% while business strikes are 50%
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
Quote: I heard something interesting the other day that any proofset 1967 quarters or dimes are in fact 80% while business strikes are 50% Do you mean 1968?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2781 Posts |
unless you come up with a conclusive MEASUREABLE test it really doesn't matter, you still have to convince the BUYER that it is 80%. common practice (unless you are a store front gold buyer / pawn shop) is to pay 65% as the mintage #s were apparantly very close. previous thread: http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j...CwQFjAB&url=http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp%3FARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=42080&ei=g7ZyT61NotWIAtb-oJwL&usg=AFQjCNEFqCxt5sZ--bn-ixCX_5fDCoQTMA according to the ebay silver guide: (they say it's impossible to tell) The silver content is easy to determine on many circulating Canadian coins, but there are a few things to look for. Firstly, silver coins dated before 1920 are sterling (.925%) silver. Dollars, half dollars, quarters and dimes from 1920 - 1966 are all 80% silver by weight. The easy calculation to figure out the pure silver weight is by multiplying .6 oz per dollar of coinage. As an example, $10 of 1966 dimes would be .6 x 10 or 6 oz's of pure silver. Multiplying the total by today's price would give you "melt" value of the coins. The tricky part comes with the 1967 and 1968 coins. In 1967 the Canadian mint shifted production from 80% to 50% on some of the coins. It is virtually impossible to test the difference as an individual. And in 1968 they moved from 50% silver to 99% nickel, removing any silver value for the post 1968's. However, that shift was made mid year as well and many 50% silver quarters and dimes were minted, as well as the nickel ones. The way to test is with a magnet. If the coins sticks, it is nickel, if not, it is silver. At 50% the "per dollar" value of the coin use a multiplier of .375. Using the example above $10 of 1968 dimes would be .375 x 10 or 3.75 oz's of pure silver. Here is the coin breakdown for 1967 and 1968 Canadian silver coins: 1967 1968 $1 80% 0% 50 80% 0% 25 50 or 80% 50 or 0% 10 50 or 80% 50 or 0%
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Quote:Quote: I heard something interesting the other day that any proofset 1967 quarters or dimes are in fact 80% while business strikes are 50% Do you mean 1968? I can see where 1967 would be the right year. Dunno if the story is true.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
155 Posts |
And I thought all this would be uncomplicated! Thanks for the input everyone.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 2,471 |
|