| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 2,172 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2044 Posts |
 Probus AE Antoninianus. Tripolis mint. IMP C M AVR PROBVS P F AVG, radiate draped bust right / CLEMENTIA TEMP, emperor standing right, holding eagle tipped scepter, receiving globe from Jupiter. Mintmark KA. RIC V-2 Tripolis 927 I'm sort of at a loss about what to do with this coin now. It's an incomplete cleaning job. As I mentioned before. I was using a safety pin to clean this coin because the dirt on the coin just wouldn't come off. So, I took a scan of the coin and noticed that there are a couple metal spots showing. Something I didn't notice and wasn't viewable to the naked eye. I thought I was doing good. First I used a crockpot with distilled water for about a week on low heat. This really removed a lot of dirt that apparently was bonded to the surface of the coin. Then I done the same thing in the crockpot again, this time with olive oil which is what turned the coin black. Then I started to use a safety pin, the dirt seemed to be coming off a bit easier after all the soaking. I stopped cleaning it because of the bare metal spots viewable from a scanner image. Which is why it's incomplete. Not sure what to do about it now. Here is what the coin originally looked like. 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4253 Posts |
I think you've done a really good job so far, but don't stop yet. Keep soaking. For a long time even. Instead of a safety pin, use wooden toothpicks. They're less likely to damage the coin's surface. I can't see the mint mark from your image, but KA is the mint mark for Serdica.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2044 Posts |
The reason why I stopped is because of the small metal spots showing. Should I continue soaking, even so?
I was using Helvetica's Excel sheets. It said Tripolis and Wildwinds the same. It was kind of puzzling to me since I thought KA is Serdica as well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Gil-galad: Your patience has been rewarded. The 'after' is much better than the 'before'.
I have used tooth picks on similar coins, but to no avail. Using a safety pin may seem to be a rash thing to do, but with LOTS of patience, ain't so bad on re consideration.
A safety pin is much easier to hold. The technique is to press the point of the pin in the middle of the verdigris or encrustation or whatever, and apply downward pressure, WITHOUT scraping. Tiny little pieces of gritty substances will just fly off.
It takes literally hours to clean a coin in this way, and only black Roman bronze coins really respond to this treatment.
I have cleaned only one cheap Roman bronze coin in this way, because all of your patience and time will be consumed. My result is about as good as the coin seen here.
The black finish on the coin is the result of immersion in olive oil over a long period of time. The only coins I have considered for immersion in olive oil were already black.
I am at a loss as to how to remove the black colour. Perhaps gentle rubbing with fine powdered anhydrous clay may help to lighten it, remove some of the residual olive oil, and help to attain a pseudo 'desert' patina. That is only a guess on my part however. Experiment on any other cheapie black late Roman bronze coin to prove / disprove this.
Edited by sel_69l 04/23/2012 09:02 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
You did an excellent job cleaning this coin, I agree with JW that you should let it soak for some more time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1549 Posts |
KA is not a mint mark but just an indicator that the mint that produced it was one that used the Greek version (K=20 A=1) of XXI to indicate the alloy. If you want to attribute the coin to mint, you will need to check which of the 'KA' mints issued this type and legend combination and compare the style of the coin to them if there is more than one. In all honesty I can't tell with the coin in its current state. Old RIC (I'm anxious to see what the new version will say) says Tripolis used both KA and XXI but did not use officina letters while Serdica would have followed the KA with a workshop letter. This coin has a lump of crud there which needs to go to see if there is a letter beneath. I suspect there will be so the coin may be Serdica but I am not into these deeply enough to make the call on style alone.
These coins are not like US with 'open markings' in every case. Under Probus a few mints gave a city initial on some coins but most require learning some trick.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
This coin is cleaning up nicely!  I'm always suprised by seeing a new Roman coin type here. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4973 Posts |
i think its looking good! looks like you got your bronze spot at 7 o'clock tyring to scrap off that little mound of stuff? If so, I did the same thing last week. Had a hard light colored deposit, scraped like mad thinking bare bronze wouldn't look worse than an encrustation...and got the bare bronze. Anyone know how to deal with those little things? as far as what appears to be dark stuff on the surface...i don't know what to do with that sometimes. if its dirt it fits on the surface like a glove and doesn't obscure details..but doesn't look right either... look at this coin I gave up on....    Black looks like patina, but there is the green underneath...at least in some spots. but that black sure doesn't want to come off...you can see some bare bronze there at 7 o'clock..which is when I gave up and put some wax on it.  Advice appreciated...thanks.
Edited by chrsmat71 04/23/2012 10:07 pm
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 2,172 |
|