Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help Report This Item.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 37 / Views: 3,111Next Topic
Page: of 3
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts
 Posted 06/22/2012  9:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jmkendall to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I gota agree, I may not like it, but I am so jaded by every Morgan being listed as "PQ DMPL MS65" when in fact it is an AU with dull surfaces. It happens all the time. I agree I don't like overgrading,and the newbies do get taken advantage of.
Pillar of the Community
paleoguy45's Avatar
United States
2936 Posts
 Posted 06/22/2012  9:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add paleoguy45 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have bought quite a few things from this seller and he actually is a good guy to buy from. He does accept much lower bids than the BIN and doesn't do anything to disguise the true condition of his offerings. I have sent back only one coin that had some damage I missed and he refunded my money without hesitation. PG
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 06/22/2012  10:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I see that you have a problem with him putting "vf" in the title, and listing, but is he actually doing anything wrong?


Morally no, but according to ebay rules yes. You cant put grades on raw coins anywhere in the listing or even for slabbed coins not from PCGS NGC ANACS or ICG. It seems the letter grades get past the current ebay filter though.

But its not something I would go out of my way to report
Pillar of the Community
enworb's Avatar
Australia
4411 Posts
 Posted 06/22/2012  10:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add enworb to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
95% of coins on ebay are over graded. If you reported them all you wouldn't have an ebay to buy from. I dont see anything wrong with this listing other than the obvious over grading and dont think it goes out of its way to mislead or anything like that.

Every newbie makes mistakes and I believe its necessary to buy a few dud coins to learn from mistake. Its part of the hobby and I dont look back and regret my early purchases, they contributed to the quickest lesson I learned in numismatics, research a coin before ou buy it.
Valued Member
TJB17's Avatar
United States
492 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  12:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TJB17 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I originally agreed with basebal21, but then I checked the ebay policies site. http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies...rstamps.html
Looks like letter grades are ok, but not numerical grades.

Quote:
Raw coins

A raw coin is one that hasn't been graded by a coin grading company, or one that has been graded, but not by an approved grading company. Raw coins can be listed on ebay as long as:
  • A numeric grade (such as MS-65, VF-25) isn't included in the title, description, or item specifics of the listing.
  • No estimate of value (even if personal opinion) or reference to a price guide is included in the title or description.
  • The listing includes a photo of the coin being sold. Images that are dark, out of focus, edited, or might be misleading aren't allowed. Also, stock photos aren't allowed.
  • The starting, reserve, or Buy It Now price for the coin is less than $2500.
Moderator
Learn More...
vermontensium's Avatar
United States
16679 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  12:30 am  Show Profile   Check vermontensium's eBay Listings Check vermontensium's eCrater Listings Bookmark this reply Add vermontensium to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That's correct.

Ex.

VF
AU
XF....etc.
swcoin.ecrater.com
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  12:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I really think they intended to have no grading but from their rules they really are kind of poorly written.

If you take it at face value you could say oh well I just said vf or au thats not numeric but ebay probably expected that people would have followed it with a number grade afterwards anyway.

You could also argue any grade reference is an estimation of value, but its not a direct one.

To much grey area.

Either allow grading or dont. Personally I like it better if people cant just grade their own raw coins but its not a huge deal. But none of this well you can ballpark grade it but cant put an exact grade stuff.
Pillar of the Community
OldSkoolMadSkilz's Avatar
United States
2077 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  02:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add OldSkoolMadSkilz to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There are thousands of misgraded coins on ebay. I think anyone who buys a coin based on stated grade without examining it, deserves what they get. The only listings I report are one with counterfeits or forgeries or if the seller has some other deceptive practice.
Pillar of the Community
Gyrene7483's Avatar
United States
1704 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  02:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Gyrene7483 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I really think they ( ebay) intended to have no grading but from their rules they really are kind of poorly written.

Their policy is quite clear and precise. Since grading is subjective ebay has taken the position that a person, collector or dealer, isn't qualified to make the distinction between a VF-25 and a VF-30 so they won't allow the numbers but will let you specify a grade which is perfectly reasonable.

So many people who haven't been collectors before the grading services got started just don't know how to grade coins themselves and have come to rely on others to grade coins for them. Every collector should have at least a copy of the ANA Grading Standards and Photograde in their numismatic library.


Quote:
You could also argue any grade reference is an estimation of value, but its not a direct one.


A grade reference absolutely is a direct estimation of value whether or not you add the Sheldon number or not.

If a person sees what they believe is an over graded or overpriced coin on ebay so what they don't have to bid on it. There are plenty of other places on the WWW where collectors can buy from honest and reputable dealers besides the monopolistic ebay and their anti buyer and seller policies.

Ed
ANA LM-3175
Bedrock of the Community
basebal21's Avatar
13014 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  02:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Their policy is quite clear and precise. Since grading is subjective ebay has taken the position that a person, collector or dealer, isn't qualified to make the distinction between a VF-25 and a VF-30 so they won't allow the numbers but will let you specify a grade which is perfectly reasonable.

So many people who haven't been collectors before the grading services got started just don't know how to grade coins themselves and have come to rely on others to grade coins for them. Every collector should have at least a copy of the ANA Grading Standards and Photograde in their numismatic library.


Thats my point exactly though. Very few people are qualified or could correct say vf25 vs vf30 and those same people arent necessarily qualified to say vf vs au either.

My point is either allow it or dont. If they really are worried about bad grading get rid of it all together. But if your going to allow someone to guess au or ms might as well allow them to put a number on there.

I dont ever go by what they say, in fact I dont buy raw coins off ebay anyway and thats one of the reasons. But theyre still going to price it at whatever vf or au or ms level they think the coin is anyway so allowing that at all undermines their no raw grading policy
Locked
822 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  08:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add scubu to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
A grade reference absolutely is a direct estimation of value whether or not you add the Sheldon number or not.


Complete hogwash, Check sold 1921 "MS" Morgans on eBay, at the time of this posting they went anywhere from $27 to $630.
Edited by scubu
06/23/2012 08:34 am
Pillar of the Community
dsfreeworld's Avatar
United States
4337 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  08:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dsfreeworld to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
the bottom line, for me, is protecting the "less than sophisticated consumer"

There are cases litigated daily in this country across various markets and mediums where deceptive, or perceived deceptive, advertising techniques will take advantage of the less than sophisticated consumer.

*** Edited by Staff for Family Friendliness *** but I am all for a clear and defined rules set where ambiguity is removed and there are no more resulting assumptions on behalf of certain consumers with regards to the level of coin they are buying.

As ridiculous as it might sound to some of you, a truly less than sophisticated coin buyer might think all "VF" coins look like that junk I provided the link to.

Yes, we should educate ourselves but we should equally rely on so called experts and pillars of the selling community to not deal in half truths to the unsuspecting.

At least this is how I would present it to a judge...
Pillar of the Community
CoinHunter53562's Avatar
United States
2049 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  09:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinHunter53562 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow now we're talking about litigation and judges. I'm not sure how that applies to an ebay auction with a subjective grading issue.

When people here present a coin for grading, we usually get a good range of estimates. Grading is purely subjective and just because one calls a coin VF and another calls it F or VF-30, it doesn't mean that anyone is right or wrong. And certainly it doesn't warrant reporting an auction or bringing up legalities in my opinion.

What if I go to a garage sale or a thrift store and see an item that I feel like they are asking too much money for? Should I call the police? Should I report it to the local newspaper? Should I tell them that they are trying to commit fraud simply because I don't agree with their asking price?

If your goal is to protect the less than sophisticated consumer, that's your choice, but I think you will drive yourself crazy if you want to go about it this way (reporting auctions where you don't agree with the grade or price and then posting it to a forum asking others to do the same).

I believe in a free market where buyers and sellers are free to conduct business without others trying to interfere unless it's a blatant case of misrepresentation (trying to pass off a fake 1895 Morgan as real for example). In this case, I don't see it being even remotely close to a blatant case of the coin being misrepresented and therefore there is no reason whatsoever to report the listing.
Pillar of the Community
paleoguy45's Avatar
United States
2936 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  11:10 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add paleoguy45 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
From being on "both sides of the coin" (so to speak)as a buyer and a seller I really don't see a problem with a seller giving his estimate of a general grade category. I provide an estimate of every coin I list that is RAW (most of my listings are of RAW coins). I do qualify the estimate with a "(est.)" however. ebay is like Alice's Restaurant - you find it all up there and "caveat emptor" certainly applies, but there are enough honest sellers providing their honest assessments of RAW coin grades to mitigate against removing any reference to estimated grade for all. As an aside, one of the highest end sellers (and provider of official input to the annual Red Book) virtually ALWAYS ups his grade estimate one generic grade on his listings (ID withheld for obvious reasons).

That's my story Your Honor and I'm sticking to it!
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36841 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2012  12:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This all comes back to personal responsibility. Why isn't it the buyer's responsibility to know what he is buying? ebay can not fix "stupid" with policies. You can go to ebay and pick any other category and find sellers all over the place on description and price for the same type item. Personally, I would not have the guts to sell that coin as a VF nor would I price it at $100. When looking at the listing the first thing I did was pull a Red Book out to see if it was a better date. With the internet, anyone has the ability to check out what they are buying before they place their bid.

  Previous TopicReplies: 37 / Views: 3,111Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.46 seconds to rattle this change. Forums