Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1857 Large Cent .... Not Ugly, But Good Or Bad?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,143Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4417 Posts
 Posted 10/26/2012  11:41 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Check out this copper that's up for bids:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/14087299351...93518&_rdc=1

Genuine?
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 10/27/2012  12:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not my expertise, but I don't see anything wrong calling out to me. There's a known Large Date variety that matches, to include the misaligned "57."
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4417 Posts
 Posted 10/27/2012  12:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The strike appears quite evenly flat to me; particularly so, the stars. I thought it to be unusual, considering the higher grade and having owned some of these that were better struck-up. Thought I'd see what the coppers "die" guys have to say about this one.
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 10/27/2012  01:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm thinking a righteous VF35 Large Date and maybe $200-ish? But, yeah, the strike's a bit flat, if consistent with an old die. Not that there'd be many old dies with a mintage so small, so I'm as interested as you in the thoughts of the experts. His lighting is kind of killing potential contrast which might make us think better of it.
Pillar of the Community
upstate's Avatar
United States
3283 Posts
 Posted 10/27/2012  05:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add upstate to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I suppose it could be recolored but a nice large cent overall
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2012  03:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I do not have a good feeling about this coin. The denticals on the right side of the reverse look bad, there appears to be a raised lump below the O in ONE that I don't think should be there, likewise there are raised areas coming up from the feet of the second T in STATES that I don't think should be there, and I don't see the top of a 1 coming out of the denticals below the date that should be clear on a coin in this high a grade. (I don't have my copy of Grellman with me so I can't be sure about the lump below the O or the feet of the T. But the denticals and the missing 1 do bother me.)
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4417 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2012  09:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I was hoping you'd chime in on this one, Conder. While my "bad feeling" started this thread, your study in this area, Conder, enables you to better articulate the diagnostic clues. This item does appear to be the offering of a reliable seller.
Moderator
Learn More...
vermontensium's Avatar
United States
16679 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2012  10:03 am  Show Profile   Check vermontensium's eBay Listings Check vermontensium's eCrater Listings Bookmark this reply Add vermontensium to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nothing is immediately jumping out at me as a red flag. VF30 sounds about right and yes, Large Date.
As Dave mentioned, I think the sellers contrast is making the coin lighter than it actually is.
swcoin.ecrater.com
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2012  12:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Got my Grellman now and it is definitely NOT real. Date position is completely wrong. I'll just give one diagnostic. The point of the curl over the 8 should be slightly right of the center of the 8, not centered between the inner and outer curves of the right side of the 8.
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4417 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2012  12:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for confirming my suspicion, Conder! Knew I could count on you.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2012  10:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Someone is about to lose $180 on it.

And at the last moment tries to defend his loss as a sniper causes his bid to jump another $30, where he wins because the sniper takes it with a loss of his own of $211 dollars.
Edited by Conder101
10/30/2012 10:31 am
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4417 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2012  10:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sold ... What looked like a bargain wasn't, it seems.
Pillar of the Community
Jaobler's Avatar
United States
6392 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2012  12:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd call this a very deceptive counterfeit. With the well-formed date digits and lack of obvious defects like incomplete letters or shallow details it would likely have fooled me. I have an 1857 large date in MS-64 and this coin does not jump out as suspicious at first glance.

My large cent has fairly weak details on some of the stars and I consider that a very common feature for braided hair cents. Examples with fully-struck stars are hard to find in my experience.

One additional odd feature on the suspect coin is the "fin" of metal that appears to stick out from the edge from about 7:00 to 12:00 on the obverse. Large cents usually have very "chunky" edges that are uniformly smooth. Perhaps this is the remnant of a casting seam? Seems odd that they wouldn't have "fixed" this on what otherwise seems like a very well-made counterfeit.

Thanks for the expert diagnosis Condor101!
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36826 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2012  4:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow, this one could fool the majority of people out there.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 10/31/2012  10:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A fin like that can often appear on a genuine US coin, especially if the dies are slightly misaligned. On the other hand it is also a characteristic of the counterfeits made by the Chinese counterfeiter that Coin World talks to all of the time. A great many of his fakes show such finning. It isn't a casting seam, it is the result of too high a pressure in the striking or a slightly oversized clearance between the collar and the neck of the die.
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4417 Posts
 Posted 10/31/2012  12:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here's another 1857 large cent, large date, for comparison:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1857-BRAIDE...40872993518&

The position of the hairs' end over the 8 is much closer than on the subject piece.

Thinking back as to what caused me to suspect the subject piece ... The strike seemed a bit mushy to me, and then there was a noticeable lack of contact marks. This combination struck me as odd.
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,143Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums