1927f, 1928, 1936, 1942, 1944 And 1951f Grading

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 7 / Views: 1,869
ECS Valued Member Australia 64 Posts	Posted 12/14/2012 06:46 am hi all, just throwing these out there to see if any one can help with a grading. the top row of the photos is from a scanner and the bottom row is from a camera. Cheers - Geoff Report this Post to the Staff

enworb Pillar of the Community Australia 4411 Posts	Posted 12/14/2012 07:11 am The photos are too small and bright to offer any accurate grades but they all look like nice presentable coins though. Report this Post to the Staff
SHAFTA9a Bedrock of the Community Canada 10743 Posts	Posted 12/14/2012 08:34 am Great looking Florins.. I have been saying that a scan doesn't do a coin any justice, look at the difference in the photo, Report this Post to the Staff
trout1105 Pillar of the Community Australia 7096 Posts	Posted 12/14/2012 10:17 am Quote: I have been saying that a scan doesn't do a coin any justice, look at the difference in the photo a photo will make the coin look more natural/better But a high res scan will show up every single defect in a coin. I personally scan a new coin for my collection and if I cant find anything significant I will then use my usb gizmo to have a detailed look,to make sure. It may just be me but I find it easier to get an accurate grade this way Report this Post to the Staff
wwwww Pillar of the Community Australia 541 Posts	Posted 12/15/2012 6:20 pm A scan cannot hope to show the same depth as a photo, the only advantage a scan has is that lighting is fixed. Something which can be achieved through the flash of many cameras. Report this Post to the Staff
ECS Valued Member Australia 64 Posts	Posted 12/16/2012 03:21 am Thanks guys, i have not mastered the camera thing yet, that is why I did the scans to show what trout would describe as "warts and all" and the photos to show the luster if any. i do agree that the camera makes the coin look better as can be seen in the 1951 federation. just out of interest, is this any better for an approximate grade? Scans and Photos Report this Post to the Staff
enworb Pillar of the Community Australia 4411 Posts	Posted 12/16/2012 03:33 am Those are better but could be larger still. If that coin is significantly lustrous I would say its close to UNC as I cant see any wear or significant impacts. Report this Post to the Staff
ECS Valued Member Australia 64 Posts	Posted 12/16/2012 04:14 am this any better? Scans and photos Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 7 / Views: 1,869

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: Australia, New Zealand, and South Pacific (Oceania) Coins and Currency Forums Forum: Coin, Bank Note, and Paper Money Grading: Australia, New Zealand, & South Pacific (Oceania)

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change.