| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 18,942 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
648 Posts |
Wow... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Arab Emirates
557 Posts |
They need to hit them a little harder than that.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts |
I have never trusted these private coin mints before, and I will never trust them now. What were the odds that they were honest anyways? Not just anybody had access to the WTC rubble in the first place. I wonder how they thought they could have lied about this one!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1227 Posts |
Can we call for prison terms for whoever thought this up? After all, if it were one of us lowly peons they'd call it . . .
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2543 Posts |
Does that mean that my genuine one of a kind $50 Buffalo Gold Clad Coin, plated in 14mg of 24 carat gold for the one time only introductory price of $19.99 my also be " unapproved " or not one of a kind. Over New Years HSN sold over 12,000 limited edition first day of issue ANACS MS 70 2013 ASE's for $110 each. That's over 1.3 million dollars for $372,000 worth of silver National Mint sold almost 200,000 of these coins over the years at 49.99. Math anyone ? That's $11,000,000 in sales and all it cost them was a $750,000 fine. What a great country
Edited by denco7 01/20/2013 4:44 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1208 Posts |
"Avoid disappointment and future regret! Call now!"
|
|
New Member
United States
28 Posts |
That commercial for the gold coin cracks me up everytime. Did anyone Notice the word "COPY" strategically placed inside the braid of the Indian, you would not see it unless you were really looking.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
370 Posts |
Quote: That commercial for the gold coin cracks me up everytime. Did anyone Notice the word "COPY" strategically placed inside the braid of the Indian, you would not see it unless you were really looking. Love the "That's four nines" after stating it's clad in .9999 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
.
Edited by dcarr 01/22/2013 2:29 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Basically they are admitting no wrongdoing and are paying the money to make the problem go away.
As for the WTC pieces I seriously doubt that didn't use recovered silver. Why risk getting called on not using it when so much of the stuff is available. As Carr said their advertising never claimed that the pieces were made for JUST tower recovered silver, but that they contained silver from the recovery. It is common practice for "made from" or "relic" pieces to be made from large batches of metal to which a small amount of actual metal from the relic has been added. Even if they did use JUST recovered silver, the pieces they were called on the carpet about were the ones with the little "pop-up" towers. They only contained 15 mg of silver plated on the towers. Why risk not using recovered silver when a single PCGS WTC recovery silver eagle would have provided enough silver to produce 2,000 of the tribute pieces.
As much as I dislike the company, they got the shaft here because I don't believe they did anything wrong. True their ads can be misleading if you make assumptions, but their descriptions are typically accurate. They tell you you are buying a plated coin but not in those precise words, the customer buys it and then gets upset because they got a plated coin? Well whose fault is that? Not the company's, they got exactly what they were promised. The company was then sued because their customers were unhappy because they got what they ordered and not the great windfall they wanted.
Frankly the news article is as misleading as as some of the NCM ads. They were not ordered to pay $750K in fines, they agreed to pay $750K to settle charges. It says they "failed to identify their wares as imitations, I have never seen one of their ads that had such a failure. True they never said "This is an imitation.", but they do call them tributes, replicas, commemoratives, and on the items that actually copy real coins the word COPY IS on the items and is visible. the FTC says the agreement bars the company from misrepresenting their product, so what, they didn't misrepresent them in the first place. And in the second place it is already illegal to misrepresent a product, the agreement changes nothing. (Or are there companies out there that have an OK from the FTC to misrepresent their products?) Schumer says the nation won't tolerate a "despicable scam", well that's good but this wasn't one. And apparently the nation WILL tolerate ignorance and will try to punish companies that let the ignorant cheat themselves. I'd say the real reason for this is that the NY Senator and Representative don't want competition for the WTC museum funding.
Edited by Conder101 01/21/2013 6:18 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: They tell you you are buying a plated coin but not in those precise words, the customer buys it and then gets upset because they got a plated coin? Well whose fault is that? Not the company's, they got exactly what they were promised. The While that may technically be true from the letter of the law its not exactly what you would call an ethical upfront business. At the very least they are intentionally being vague hoping you will make assumptions to increase sales.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2543 Posts |
If you read the original filing, the suit had nothing to do with the content of the coins. The federal government issued WTC commemorative coins with proceeds going to the WTC park and museum . Those were officially sanctioned coins. The NCM coins advertised themselves as the only official WTC coins. This was patently false. They also made 22 million dollars off of these coins, with zero going to the families, museum , park, or in anyway, the memory of the 3000 plus people who lost their lives. Had they not falsely competed with the official commemoratives, how much of that 22 million could have gone towards a permanent memorial to the victims of this horrible attack against the U.S.
These coins also DID NOT have copy on them , in violation of the Federal Hobby Protection Act. The suit further stated that NCM sent and charged customers for additional coins they did not want and did not have a simple, logical and easy to navigate return system. Thereby making it difficult to impossible to return items and get refunds.
It was only after 8 years of lining their pockets and legal pressure from the victims families, did they finally agree to donate to any 9/11 charities. And even then, they didn't open their own wallets, they collected 2 mil from corporate customers and strong armed suppliers to donate to 9/11 charities.
They also didn't " offer up " in good faith $750,000 to settle. The state of NY was looking for $500 per coin in civil and punitive damages. They negotiated to save their skins. Again, the suit had nothing to do with the metal content or where the silver was from, it was the the claim of the " only official " nature of these coins. And the thought by consumers that these being the only offically minted coins, that a portion was going to the 9/11 memorial. NCM lawyers called it another attempt by the State of NY to squash competition. Your darn right it is , while the officially sanctioned coins were used to fund the WTC museum and memorial to remember 3000 innocent people who lost their lives and 350 first responders who lost their lives heroically trying to save others , the proceeds from NCM fraudulently advertised " the only officially sanctioned WTC coin " were going to fund Mr. Freedberg and Mr. Goldwater's summer homes in the Hamptons. And that is a, now remedied , slap in the face to every family that lost a father, mother, daughter ,son husband or wife in this terrible tragedy.
Please take this suit for what it was and not what it wasn't
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
The lawsuit was filed in 2010 if I remember correctly, more than a year before there was any official medal to compete against. I don't know if NCM called them the "Only official WTC coin" or not but was there any other "official" coin or medal at the time? (Remember the government medal was still well in the future.) And all they would have had to do to get "Official" sanction would be to get permission from the owners of the building. They didn't have COPY on them because they didn't need to. They weren't a copy of any previous design, they were an original design making them an "original numismatic item" under the definitions of the HPA. And sure they negotiated a settlement, and a settlement that was a lot less than what the suit filers were after, lawsuits are annoying and for a relatively small amount of money they made the problem go away. Quote: They also made 22 million dollars off of these coins, with zero going to the families, museum , park, or in anyway, the memory of the 3000 plus people who lost their lives. And they never promised to give them any of the money either. So once again they did nothing wrong. Quote: Had they not falsely competed with the official commemoratives, how much of that 22 million could have gone towards a permanent memorial to the victims of this horrible attack against the U.S. Well considering the poor job of advertising and promoting the government did for the medal, probably fairly close to zero dollars. And remember there was no false competition. If anything you could say the government created a medal to compete with the NCM medal. And did a poor job of it. An even worse job considering by the time it came out the NCM medal had been off the market for awhile.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
I'm ashamed not only as a NY'r but as an American that I share the same soil as these maggots. What a bunch of nimrods.
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 18,942 |