I'm really confused with the grading, I see coins online graded MS65 that don't look near as good. also, mine is a lot brighter and silver looking than it does in the my photos. Example - http://www.moorecoins.com/1961-ICCS...to_i12928444
That coin looks far more scratched and worn than mine. How is that "Gem" or MS65 condition ? Doesn't make sense to me !
It's hard-- I've been at a year--every day and still know nothing-- just keep at it and test yourself with one series--say the silver dollar only. I remember a NASCAR mechanic saying he was an expert at reading engine conditions by examining spark plug deposits-------it took about 5000 views before he was comfortable with his assessments.
All the Northern Lights are doubled-- as well as the legends on the reverse. On the obverse----the face on the bust appears "grease struck "--very unclear eyelid. I had a look at the Moor's coin--- and agree with your comments--I prefer your coin-- that Moor's is truly ugly--- Graders give: 40% for Surface preservation 20% for Strike 20% for Luster 20% for Appearance
I'm fairly new at this too, but what I'm doing, till I know better, it to grade it on wear(yours I'd say is AU50) and then grade it on overall appearance(I know it's really hard to get a good picture), but what I see is a VG8. Then meet in the middle and rate it as an XF40. For me, these less expensive coins will give you a lot of grey hair is you try to make it an absolute science in grading them. Cheers
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use