| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,223 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3124 Posts |
Would love to know everyone's thoughts...  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
195 Posts |
My first thought was MS62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
836 Posts |
I say 62, but a TPG would probably bump it to a 63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1959 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
798 Posts |
I am absolutely sure that this is an MS-63. Although it looks a little better. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
It certainly looks a 63, but I think because of the excess bag marks on the focal point of of the obverse, at least PCGS would give it a 62.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
138 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm thinking most of the marks seen on the obverse are luster grazes and it would grade MS-63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36738 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18657 Posts |
I'm in at 62...too many abrasions and hits to go higher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3124 Posts |
Quote: I'm thinking most of the marks seen on the obverse are luster grazes and it would grade MS-63. Thanks Dave and all. Dave, you are correct, the coin has beautiful luster and coin in hand does not look as bad as my pictures shows. I should re-shoot it again to better illustrate it. Thinking of sending it out for grading. Worth doing? Thanks again...
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,223 |