Is This 1897 Morgan Polished/Cleaned?

With the understanding that the images, in a flip and nowhere near large enough, aren't sufficient to justify an accurate opinion, I'm not pessimistic about the surfaces as I see them here. I don't see evidence of the need for polishing on the obverse - usually that's done to remove crud/color and they rarely get it all; one can normally see telltales in the tightest crannies of the devices. Further, the reverse looks to be a very nice, original toning progression. If the coin is recovering from a past dipping, it's certainly doing it right.

Given the huge mintages involved, I'm not surprised at a coin which doesn't show great cartwheel. The second image illustrates an evenness of finish that doesn't necessarily alarm me. But again, I'm expressing opinions based on what I know to be insufficient evidence, and with larger images I might change my mind very quickly.

Here's some pictures outside of the flip, the first couple are under white lighting in my bathroom, the rest in my living room with yellow light.

Agree with Vermont dipped and or wiped and now retoned. I also see a rim bump.

Thanks for the responses, everyone. I'm debating myself whether to keep it or not, as I do love the reverse and the dipping/cleaning appears to have been not toooo harsh since there is still a light cartwheel on both sides (stronger on reverse). And it didn't cost me all that much. Still, I'm annoyed that someone who sells a ton of coins on ebay apparently didn't recognize it as dipped/cleaned and state so honestly. :-\

That is a keeper for sure IMO. After seeing the second set of pics, not polished. I am not going to say dipped either, but I wont say it wasn't. Regardless, the toning on the reverse is awesome and its overall eye appeal is good. If you decide not to keep it, let me know. I will give it a good home.